From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD05EC07E9A for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62BD613A9 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 06:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238091AbhGNGmB (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:42:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238064AbhGNGmA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:42:00 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43505C061574 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3YXx-0002oE-1Y; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:39:05 +0200 Received: from [2a0a:edc0:0:900:1d::77] (helo=ptz.office.stw.pengutronix.de) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3YXv-0007Gu-V5; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:39:03 +0200 Received: from ukl by ptz.office.stw.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3YXv-0003W5-U3; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:39:03 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:39:01 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Baolin Wang , Chunyan Zhang , Alexander Sverdlin , Thomas Hebb , kernel@pengutronix.de, Orson Zhai , Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pwm: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped Message-ID: <20210714063901.5fmsinbhxoxvxhkf@pengutronix.de> References: <20210701082755.332593-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20210708123639.vrck33kc534yrnsq@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gur4klcypbpluvmq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org --gur4klcypbpluvmq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Thierry, On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:36:39PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > Hello Thierry, > >=20 > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:27:50AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > > Geert Uytterhoeven found a regression in one of my patches. The same > > > problem exists in several further commits. The respective drivers are > > > fixed in this series. > > >=20 > > > The affected commits for the first patch is already in v5.4, so this > > > patch should maybe backported to stable. > > > The others are in Thierry's for-next branch only. > >=20 > > These four broken patches were now included in your pull request to > > Linus for v5.14-rc1 but these fixes were not. I wonder that the > > regression Geert reported made you back out the offending commit but you > > didn't care for the four identical problems in pwm-spear, pwm-tiecap, > > pwm-berlin and pwm-ep93xx. Did you miss this series? >=20 > Ugh... this is a nice big mess now. In retrospect I should've just > backed out all those patches. Or rather not have applied them in the > first place until they got a Tested-by. >=20 > I'll pull in this series and will send this as a follow-up pull request. I saw you applied the series to your for-next branch, so next is fixed since next-20210709. I wonder what makes you wait sending these to Linus. The facts are: - Fixes were sent to the list on 2021-07-01 - next was broken since at least next-20210701 up to next-20210708 - linus/master is broken since v5.14-rc1~42 (2021-07-08) for ep93xx, berlin, tiecap, spear and since v5.4-rc1~27 (2019-09-27) for sprd Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | --gur4klcypbpluvmq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEfnIqFpAYrP8+dKQLwfwUeK3K7AkFAmDuhoIACgkQwfwUeK3K 7AlMWQf9HK0BXQjZ6j0dXgvbQpAe63Pj2ddwSQNkXX+OvHMHz1bHwt+XaznPfwJc hfVhmVhCTLAm050F+u3ADe/whvnydWYNcYc74/je8FjcDKJVGi41f+roBIBl3bvs zVZ6U7P9Yx/1S0pjCiiu768/ZsPj5gMpxq55mgu2BQjCMAjRfm+h3N08om5e6z00 MOq4wgkcYMp704l1PLO0FhW9iVCDTzoqvdHqB4QRq5Y37u3QS4kyJrnx6VsxAtZ7 pRbmM5IG0PC2Guwr991ciyslBbTilXdpnPUJ9ol7QSt+0w3cceOOnd4V3M5p/Ghu 30UYrZUtutQUAXmEB7J9XJebeFd8oQ== =jQ+q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gur4klcypbpluvmq--