From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundat>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] pwm: add support for sl28cpld PWM controller
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:45:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d8e9f524f0fd81be282be0be50d16ad@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715163620.xhi24mct5b64qpyp@pengutronix.de>
Hi Uwe,
Am 2020-07-15 18:36, schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:09:28PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > My wishlist (just as it comes to my mind, so no guarantee of
>> > completeness):
>> >
>> > - can do 0% duty cycle for all supported period lengths
>> > - can do 100% duty cycle for all supported period lengths
>> > - supports both polarities
>> > - supports immediate change of configuration and after completion of
>> > the currently running period
>> > - atomic update (i.e. if you go from configuration A to configuration B
>> > the hardware guarantees to only emit periods of type A and then type
>> > B. (Depending on the item above, the last A period might be cut off.)
>>
>> We actually discussed this, because the implementation would be
>> easier. But
>> if the change takes place immediately you might end up with a longer
>> duty
>> cycle. Assume the PWM runs at 80% duty cycle and starts with the
>> on-period.
>> If you now change that to 50% you might end up with one successive
>> duty
>> cycle of "130%". Eg. the 80% of the old and right after that you
>> switch to
>> the new 50% and then you'd have a high output which corresponds to a
>> 130%
>> cycle. I don't know if that is acceptable for all applications.
>
> I thought this is a "change takes place immediately" implementation?!
> So
> these problems are actually real here. (And this not happening is
> exactly
> my wish here. Is there a mis-understanding?)
I wasn't talking about the sl28cpld btw. What is the difference between
your proposed "change take place immediately" and "after the cycle".
I understand how the after the cycle should work. But how would the
immediate change work in your ideal PWM?
>> > > > If you change only cycle but not mode, does the hardware complete the
>> > > > currently running period?
>> > >
>> > > No it does not.
>> >
>> > Please document this as a Limitation.
>>
>> I've discussed this internally, for now its a limitation. In the worst
>> case you'd do one 100% duty cycle. Maybe we can fix the hardware. I
>> acknowledge that this is a severe limitation, esp. if you use the PWM
>> for controlling stuff (for now its only LCD backlight.. so thats ok).
>
> That happens if you reduce the duty cycle from A to B and the counter
> is
> already bigger than B but smaller than A, right?
That is correct.
> The fix would be to
> compare for counter >= match instead of counter = match. (Which then
> would result in a period with a duty cycle bigger than B but smaller
> than A. Also not ideal, but probably better.)
This would actually work. I could imagine that comparing "less than"
will
take up more space again. But it would be worth a try; see also below.
>> > > > What about disable()?
>> > >
>> > > Mhh well, it would do one 100% cycle.. mhh ;) Lets see if there we can
>> > > fix that (in hardware), not much we can do in the driver here. We are
>> > > _very_ constraint in size, therefore all that little edge cases fall
>> > > off
>> > > the table.
>> >
>> > You're saying that on disable the hardware emits a constant high level
>> > for one cycle? I hope not ...
>>
>> Mh, I was mistaken, disabling the PWM will turn it off immediately,
>> but
>
> And does turn off mean, the output gets inactive?
> If so you might also disable the hardware if a 0% duty cycle is
> configured assuming this saves some energy without modifying the
> resulting wave form.
Disabling it has some side effects like switching to another function
for this multi function pin. So I'd rather keep it on ;)
>> one 100% duty cycle may happen if you change from a higher to a lower
>> duty cycle setting. See above.
>>
>> > I never programmed a CPLD to emulate a hardware PWM, but I wonder if
>> > these are really edge cases that increase the size of the binary?!
>>
>> At the moment there is only one 8bit register which stores the value
>> which is used for matching. If you want to change that setting after
>> a whole cycle, you'd use another 8bit register to cache the new value.
>> So this would at least needs 8 additional flip-flops. This doesn't
>> sound much, but we are already near 100% usage of the CPLD. So its
>> hard to convince people why this is really necessary.
>
> OK. (Maybe there is enough space to allow implementing 100% for mode
> 0?)
Little bit here a little bit there ;) TBH there are some more critical
bugs which would need to be fixed first. So this would need to be a
limitation for now.
-michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-06 17:53 [PATCH v5 00/13] Add support for Kontron sl28cpld Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] regmap-irq: use fwnode instead of device node in add_irq_chip() Michael Walle
2020-07-08 10:22 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20200706175353.16404-1-michael-QKn5cuLxLXY@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] mfd: add simple regmap based I2C driver Michael Walle
[not found] ` <20200706175353.16404-3-michael-QKn5cuLxLXY@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-17 9:04 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-19 22:25 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-17 9:06 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-19 22:31 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-20 7:43 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] watchdog: add support for sl28cpld watchdog Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: enable LED support Michael Walle
2020-07-17 8:36 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-17 21:54 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] dt-bindings: mfd: Add bindings for sl28cpld Michael Walle
2020-07-13 16:04 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: add sl28cpld support Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] irqchip: add sl28cpld interrupt controller support Michael Walle
2020-07-08 9:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] pwm: add support for sl28cpld PWM controller Michael Walle
2020-07-09 8:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20200709085006.b54ype3p4yu64upl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-11 17:28 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-13 8:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-14 11:31 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-14 16:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-14 21:09 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-15 16:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-15 17:45 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2020-07-15 18:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-15 20:41 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-16 6:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller Michael Walle
[not found] ` <20200706175353.16404-9-michael-QKn5cuLxLXY@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-08 7:35 ` Linus Walleij
2020-07-17 0:25 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] hwmon: add support for the sl28cpld hardware monitoring controller Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: enable sl28cpld Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: map GPIOs to input events Michael Walle
2020-07-06 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: enable fan support Michael Walle
[not found] ` <20200706175353.16404-14-michael-QKn5cuLxLXY@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-08 7:39 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdaPO7CGNrxmjL5QH1cxP5wqku1oMtQaQgJfeKiKqiGAOg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-08 7:56 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-08 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] Add support for Kontron sl28cpld Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d8e9f524f0fd81be282be0be50d16ad@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundat \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).