From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpio: mvebu: improve pwm period calculation accuracy
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:22:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8be9177df5081ccfbbb5ec6e2fabf5937801f453.1610529002.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1610529002.git.baruch@tkos.co.il>
Change 'off' register value calculation from
$off = (period - duty_cycle) * clkrate / NSEC_PER_SEC
to
$off = (period * clkrate / NSEC_PER_SEC) - $on
That is, divide the full period value to reduce rounding error.
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index a912a8fed197..c424d88e9e2b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -715,9 +715,9 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
else
on = 1;
- val = (unsigned long long) mvpwm->clk_rate *
- (state->period - state->duty_cycle);
+ val = (unsigned long long) mvpwm->clk_rate * state->period;
do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ val -= on;
if (val > UINT_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
if (val)
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 9:22 [PATCH v2 0/5] gpio: mvebu: pwm fixes and improvements Baruch Siach
2021-01-13 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] gpio: mvebu: fix pwm .get_state period calculation Baruch Siach
2021-01-13 9:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-15 15:47 ` Thierry Reding
2021-01-13 9:22 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2021-01-13 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] gpio: mvebu: make pwm .get_state closer to idempotent Baruch Siach
2021-01-13 9:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-13 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX Baruch Siach
2021-01-13 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] gpio: mvebu: document zero pwm duty cycle limitation Baruch Siach
2021-01-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] gpio: mvebu: pwm fixes and improvements Linus Walleij
2021-01-18 14:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8be9177df5081ccfbbb5ec6e2fabf5937801f453.1610529002.git.baruch@tkos.co.il \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).