From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C620631; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.237.130.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714113032; cv=none; b=HbFmAwcXlAeCo4569dqOt7n7xzFbN7fqpgZWKqfCTkj11yvUl888IgQ5FNdbY3+bxeEFU96OYmlBh/YVO8XdR1Ndbmq55qRqbkRB5meIJGhR+i+svrVvWu+W2VtqBO/l2TUvLxvcfcI4jLG4tV2emweVsUPdxB2wAZnT5YoFJgo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714113032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H+5rwc89tCjEHu0KqwHwKpS4+vjC45z3KXV2smJhxTs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=oV5VNlShmdYuGyTep9IwrMPZHADr5HH7WgkW4yFhpsk56f98KYE+PEibqjeNf+07FYIeFaM77agECT8zGNObDFJMp9xdSuDGRKzE5/lNoRVt/QrZDuwLltxi8wPNNByf0XOAOA3YcVzhroBzzV3Y6E29OW21fFauqkLhtHFW20o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=leemhuis.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=leemhuis.info; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=leemhuis.info header.i=@leemhuis.info header.b=yUt9hb3Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.237.130.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=leemhuis.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=leemhuis.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=leemhuis.info header.i=@leemhuis.info header.b="yUt9hb3Z" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leemhuis.info; s=he214686; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: In-Reply-To:References; bh=AYzZEF7JC/Zux/HGDdSRgGYZlcZDlsavbIJ+OlNLhvI=; t=1714113030; x=1714545030; b=yUt9hb3ZCnhz8vzbtmAY88dQFtay6Dw4j8vxZcMJbBLc6JW x6WKer61bW0GT1ePUmFTNGmvKu5YMlT3raSGjHW/hUaNEGmE0RR31t/ocx5+G9Xqt0x6KV+DTgg/K agQ394LfVNnjiNGrRZUCiMjEzSZ5FywEtg3wLUWVdlpPvm2dsovL3NFvfylmec1uy1th8ntu5EfPr mi7smirKCN+E25fmbd3mHid0KdXsTD2agiuSXMH3f3vS2nm9ct2JsY4Aw5DkLqhNtxXXWKOHtcwfn PPKaUFX2yILly9bVjVB+blqbW/Yfx9dEGgFpg+VLkPWtX5wXSeA/hpBXQDjyS5Rg==; Received: from [2a02:8108:8980:2478:8cde:aa2c:f324:937e]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1s0F6J-0003S9-SU; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:30:27 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:30:27 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: pwm: Disable PWM when going to suspend To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Lee Jones Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Linux regressions mailing list , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <20240417144943.GA2399047@google.com> <20240417153846.271751-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" Content-Language: en-US, de-DE Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1714113030;349e5dd1; X-HE-SMSGID: 1s0F6J-0003S9-SU On 26.04.24 08:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 05:38:47PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> On stm32mp1xx based machines (and others) a PWM consumer has to disable >> the PWM because an enabled PWM refuses to suspend. So check the >> LED_SUSPENDED flag and depending on that set the .enabled property. >> >> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218559 >> Fixes: 76fe464c8e64 ("leds: pwm: Don't disable the PWM when the LED should be off") >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König >> --- >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >>>> If you don't consider that suitable, I can create a patch that is easier >>>> to pick up. >>> >>> Yes, please submit it properly. > > Gentle ping. Even given the regression was introduced in v6.7-rc1 > already, I think this should go into v6.9. [...] FWIW, I guess Linus would agree (even if it's the second to last release in this case): https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wis_qQy4oDNynNKi5b7Qhosmxtoj1jxo5wmB6SRUwQUBQ@mail.gmail.com/ Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.