From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:36:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917093655.GG7347@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200910144833.742260-8-hch@lst.de>
On Thu 10-09-20 16:48:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just checking SB_I_CGROUPWB for cgroup writeback support is enough.
> Either the file system allocates its own bdi (e.g. btrfs), in which case
> it is known to support cgroup writeback, or the bdi comes from the block
> layer, which always supports cgroup writeback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Makes sense. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 1 -
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 -
> include/linux/backing-dev.h | 8 +++-----
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 18c092f8d69175..d81ee511ec8b01 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,6 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id)
> if (!q->stats)
> goto fail_stats;
>
> - q->backing_dev_info->capabilities = BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK;
> q->node = node_id;
>
> atomic_set(&q->nr_active_requests_shared_sbitmap, 0);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 047934cea25efa..e24927bddd5829 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3091,7 +3091,6 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
> goto fail_sb_buffer;
> }
>
> - sb->s_bdi->capabilities |= BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK;
> sb->s_bdi->ra_pages *= btrfs_super_num_devices(disk_super);
> sb->s_bdi->ra_pages = max(sb->s_bdi->ra_pages, SZ_4M / PAGE_SIZE);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> index 0b06b2d26c9aa3..52583b6f2ea05d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ratio);
> * BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB: Don't automatically account writeback pages
> * BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT: Keep number of dirty pages below bdi threshold.
> *
> - * BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK: Supports cgroup-aware writeback.
> * BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO: Device is so fast that asynchronous IO would be
> * inefficient.
> */
> @@ -233,9 +232,9 @@ int inode_congested(struct inode *inode, int cong_bits);
> * inode_cgwb_enabled - test whether cgroup writeback is enabled on an inode
> * @inode: inode of interest
> *
> - * cgroup writeback requires support from both the bdi and filesystem.
> - * Also, both memcg and iocg have to be on the default hierarchy. Test
> - * whether all conditions are met.
> + * Cgroup writeback requires support from the filesystem. Also, both memcg and
> + * iocg have to be on the default hierarchy. Test whether all conditions are
> + * met.
> *
> * Note that the test result may change dynamically on the same inode
> * depending on how memcg and iocg are configured.
> @@ -247,7 +246,6 @@ static inline bool inode_cgwb_enabled(struct inode *inode)
> return cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) &&
> cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(io_cgrp_subsys) &&
> bdi_cap_account_dirty(bdi) &&
> - (bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK) &&
> (inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_CGROUPWB);
> }
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 14:48 bdi cleanups v4 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 01/12] fs: remove the unused SB_I_MULTIROOT flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:41 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/12] drbd: remove dead code in device_to_statistics Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:46 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/12] drbd: remove RB_CONGESTED_REMOTE Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:55 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-19 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/12] bdi: initialize ->ra_pages and ->io_pages in bdi_init Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 10:04 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-19 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 05/12] md: update the optimal I/O size on reshape Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-12 6:17 ` Song Liu
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 06/12] block: lift setting the readahead size into the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 10:35 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-19 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 07/12] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-16 9:28 ` David Sterba
2020-09-17 9:36 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 08/12] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:36 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm: use SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO more intelligently Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:06 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 10/12] bdi: replace BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES with a queue and a sb flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:25 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-19 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 11/12] bdi: invert BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:27 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 12/12] bdi: replace BDI_CAP_NO_{WRITEBACK,ACCT_DIRTY} with a single flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 9:31 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-15 15:18 bdi cleanups v5 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 15:18 ` [PATCH 07/12] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917093655.GG7347@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).