From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, janpieter.sollie@edpnet.be,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:26:26 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e38b67c-9372-a42d-41eb-abdce33d3372@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240407131931.4055231-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Hi Ming,
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Ming Lei wrote:
> When one stacking device is over one device with virt_boundary_mask and
> another one with max segment size, the stacking device have both limits
> set. This way is allowed before d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to
> atomically update queue limits").
>
> Relax the limit so that we won't break such kind of stacking setting.
>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218687
> Reported-by: janpieter.sollie@edpnet.be
> Fixes: d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to atomically update queue limits")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZfGl8HzUpiOxCLm3@fedora/
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
> Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit b561ea56a26415bf ("block:
allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size") in
v6.9-rc4.
With CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG=y and IOMMU support enabled, this causes a
warning on R-Car Gen3/Gen4 platforms:
DMA-API: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee160000.mmc: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=86016] [max=65536]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 281 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1178 debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 281 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-ebisu-00012-gb561ea56a264 #596
Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu board based on r8a77990 (DT)
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330
lr : debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330
sp : ffffffc083643470
x29: ffffffc083643470 x28: 0000000000000080 x27: 0000000000010000
x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffffc0810afc30
x23: ffffffffffffffff x22: ffffffc080c8366f x21: ffffff8008849f80
x20: ffffff800cd24000 x19: ffffff80099a2810 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: ffffff800801a000 x16: ffffffc080453f00 x15: ffffffc0836430f0
x14: ffffffc08099fb50 x13: 0000000000000007 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 0000000000000202 x10: ffffffc0810d99d0 x9 : ffffffc081189bb0
x8 : ffffffc083643178 x7 : ffffffc083643180 x6 : 00000000ffffdfff
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff800ebad280
Call trace:
debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330
__dma_map_sg_attrs+0xcc/0xd0
dma_map_sg_attrs+0xc/0x1c
renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_map+0x64/0x94
renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_pre_req+0x20/0x2c
mmc_blk_mq_issue_rq+0x62c/0x6c8
mmc_mq_queue_rq+0x194/0x218
blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x36c/0x4d4
__blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x344/0x4e0
blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x28/0x5c
blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x1a4/0x218
blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x2fc/0x4a0
__blk_flush_plug+0x70/0x134
blk_finish_plug+0x24/0x34
read_pages+0x60/0x158
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x98/0x184
do_page_cache_ra+0x44/0x50
force_page_cache_ra+0x98/0x9c
page_cache_sync_ra+0x30/0x54
filemap_get_pages+0xfc/0x4f8
filemap_read+0xe8/0x2b8
blkdev_read_iter+0x12c/0x144
vfs_read+0x104/0x150
ksys_read+0x6c/0xd4
__arm64_sys_read+0x14/0x1c
invoke_syscall+0x70/0xf4
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0xcc
do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x24
el0_svc+0x34/0x8c
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0x124
el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154
irq event stamp: 0
hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffc08007efa4>] copy_process+0x6ac/0x18d4
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffc08007efa4>] copy_process+0x6ac/0x18d4
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
Reverting this commit, or disabling IOMMU support fixes the issue.
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -182,17 +182,13 @@ static int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> - * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support scatter/gather
> - * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry for each
> - * page (which might not be identical to the Linux PAGE_SIZE). Because
> - * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size".
> + * Stacking device may have both virtual boundary and max segment
> + * size limit, so allow this setting now, and long-term the two
> + * might need to move out of stacking limits since we have immutable
> + * bvec and lower layer bio splitting is supposed to handle the two
> + * correctly.
> */
> - if (lim->virt_boundary_mask) {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_segment_size &&
> - lim->max_segment_size != UINT_MAX))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
> - } else {
> + if (!lim->virt_boundary_mask) {
> /*
> * The maximum segment size has an odd historic 64k default that
> * drivers probably should override. Just like the I/O size we
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 13:19 [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size Ming Lei
2024-04-07 14:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-04-07 21:50 ` [PATCH] " Jens Axboe
2024-04-08 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 7:36 ` Ming Lei
2024-04-08 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 9:48 ` Ming Lei
2024-04-09 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 15:56 ` Ming Lei
2024-04-08 12:48 ` janpieter.sollie
2024-04-24 10:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2024-04-24 12:41 ` Ming Lei
2024-04-24 13:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e38b67c-9372-a42d-41eb-abdce33d3372@linux-m68k.org \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=janpieter.sollie@edpnet.be \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).