From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Bob Pearson <rpearson@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/17] rdma_rxe: minor cleanups
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:02:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824090237.GJ571722@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abf9804c-8fc7-7f2d-f73d-0c9260f5cf60@gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:05:43PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> On 8/21/20 9:14 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> > On 8/21/2020 6:46 AM, Bob Pearson wrote:
> >> Added vendor_part_id
> >> Fixed bug in rxe_resp.c at RKEY_VIOLATION: failed to ack bad rkeys
> >> Fixed failure to init mr in rxe_resp.c at check_rkey
> >> Fixed failure to allow invalidation of invalid MWs
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearson@hpe.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 1 +
> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 9 ++++++---
> >> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
> >> index 10f441ac7203..11b043edd647 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
> >> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static void rxe_init_device_param(struct rxe_dev *rxe)
> >> rxe->max_inline_data = RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA;
> >> rxe->attr.vendor_id = RXE_VENDOR_ID;
> >> + rxe->attr.vendor_part_id = RXE_VENDOR_PART_ID;
> >> rxe->attr.max_mr_size = RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE;
> >> rxe->attr.page_size_cap = RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP;
> >> rxe->attr.max_qp = RXE_MAX_QP;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c
> >> index 4178cf501a2b..a443deae35a3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c
> >> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ static void rxe_set_mw_rkey(struct rxe_mw *mw)
> >> pr_err_once("unable to get random rkey for mw\n");
> >> }
> >> -/* this temporary code to test ibv_alloc_mw, ibv_dealloc_mw */
> >> struct ib_mw *rxe_alloc_mw(struct ib_pd *ibpd, enum ib_mw_type type,
> >> struct ib_udata *udata)
> >> {
> >> @@ -326,9 +325,12 @@ int rxe_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe)
> >> static int check_invalidate_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_mw *mw)
> >> {
> >> - if (unlikely(mw->state != RXE_MEM_STATE_VALID)) {
> >> - pr_err_once("attempt to invalidate a MW that is not valid\n");
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> + /* run_test requires invalidate to work when !valid so don't check */
> >> + if (0) {
> >> + if (unlikely(mw->state != RXE_MEM_STATE_VALID)) {
> >> + pr_err_once("attempt to invalidate a MW that is not valid\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> /* o10-37.2.26 */
> >> @@ -344,9 +346,11 @@ static void do_invalidate_mw(struct rxe_mw *mw)
> >> {
> >> mw->qp = NULL;
> >> - rxe_drop_ref(mw->mr);
> >> - atomic_dec(&mw->mr->num_mw);
> >> - mw->mr = NULL;
> >> + if (mw->mr) {
> >> + rxe_drop_ref(mw->mr);
> >> + atomic_dec(&mw->mr->num_mw);
> >> + mw->mr = NULL;
> >> + }
> >> mw->access = 0;
> >> mw->addr = 0;
> >> @@ -378,7 +382,7 @@ int rxe_mw_check_access(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_mw *mw,
> >> struct rxe_pd *pd = to_rpd(mw->ibmw.pd);
> >> if (unlikely(mw->state != RXE_MEM_STATE_VALID)) {
> >> - pr_err_once("attempt to access a MW that is not in the valid state\n");
> >> + pr_err_once("attempt to access a MW that is not valid\n");
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >> index e1d485bdd6af..beaa3f844819 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ enum rxe_device_param {
> >> /* IBTA v1.4 A3.3.1 VENDOR INFORMATION section */
> >> RXE_VENDOR_ID = 0XFFFFFF,
> >> + RXE_VENDOR_PART_ID = 1,
> >
> > RXE_VENDOR_PART_ID can be zero.
> >
> > Zhu Yanjun
> >
> >> };
> >> /* default/initial rxe port parameters */
> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
> >> index d6e957a34910..bf7ef56aaf1c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
> >> @@ -392,8 +392,8 @@ static enum resp_states check_length(struct rxe_qp *qp,
> >> static enum resp_states check_rkey(struct rxe_qp *qp,
> >> struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt)
> >> {
> >> - struct rxe_mr *mr;
> >> - struct rxe_mw *mw;
> >> + struct rxe_mr *mr = NULL;
> >> + struct rxe_mw *mw = NULL;
> >> struct rxe_dev *rxe = to_rdev(qp->ibqp.device);
> >> u64 va;
> >> u32 rkey;
> >> @@ -1368,7 +1368,10 @@ int rxe_responder(void *arg)
> >> /* Class C */
> >> do_class_ac_error(qp, AETH_NAK_REM_ACC_ERR,
> >> IB_WC_REM_ACCESS_ERR);
> >> - state = RESPST_COMPLETE;
> >> + if (qp->resp.wqe)
> >> + state = RESPST_COMPLETE;
> >> + else
> >> + state = RESPST_ACKNOWLEDGE;
> >> } else {
> >> qp->resp.drop_msg = 1;
> >> if (qp->srq) {
> >
> >
> >
> I would agree but the pyverbs tests do not agree. If someone will fix the test I would be happy to leave it zero.
So please fix the pyverbs, together with SIW.
I don't like the idea of setting vendor_part_id randomly.
From IBTA, "A3.3.1 VENDOR INFORMATION":
A vendor that produces a generic controller (i.e., one that supports a standard
I/O protocol such as SRP), which does not have vendor specific device drivers,
may use the value of 0xFFFFFF in the VendorID field.
However, such a value prevents the vendor from ever providing vendor specific
drivers for the product
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-20 22:46 [PATCH v3 00/17] Memory window support for rdma_rxe Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] rdma_rxe: Added SPDX headers to rxe source files Bob Pearson
2020-08-24 10:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] rdma_rxe: Fixed style warnings Bob Pearson
2020-08-27 12:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] ib_user_verbs.h: Added ib_uverbs_wc_opcode Bob Pearson
2020-08-27 12:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] ib_verbs.h: Added missing IB_WR_BIND_MW opcode Bob Pearson
2020-08-27 12:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] rdma_rxe: Added bind_mw parameters to rxe_send_wr Bob Pearson
2020-08-27 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] rdma_rxe: Added stubs for alloc_mw and dealloc_mw verbs Bob Pearson
2020-08-27 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] rdma_rxe: Separated MR and MW objects Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] rdma_rxe: Added mw object Bob Pearson
2020-08-22 3:39 ` Zhu Yanjun
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] rdma_rxe: Extended pools to support both keys and indices Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] rdma_rxe: Implemented functional alloc_mw and dealloc_mw APIs Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] rdma_rxe: Address an issue with hardened user copy Bob Pearson
2020-08-22 3:32 ` Zhu Yanjun
2020-08-22 4:16 ` Bob Pearson
2020-08-24 8:47 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-08-24 8:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-08-24 23:52 ` Bob Pearson
2020-08-25 5:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] rdma_rxe: Added bind mw API stub Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] rdma_rxe: Give MR and MW objects indices and keys Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] rdma_rxe: Added stub for invalidate mw Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] rdma_rxe: Added functional bind and invalidate MW ops Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] rdma_rxe: Implemented read/write/atomic access to MW Bob Pearson
2020-08-20 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] rdma_rxe: minor cleanups Bob Pearson
[not found] ` <a153a775-9b53-3ccc-4c2a-ec76f863d1a1@gmail.com>
2020-08-22 4:05 ` Bob Pearson
2020-08-24 9:02 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-08-27 13:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824090237.GJ571722@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearson@hpe.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).