linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>, <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>,
	"Dennis Dalessandro" <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
	"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Mike Marciniszyn" <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
	"Oleksandr Andrushchenko" <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>,
	"Petr Cvek" <petrcvekcz@gmail.com>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] mm/mmu_notifier: define the header pre-processor parts even if disabled
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:23:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <770248ae-efa1-efae-a978-f52d8510f7b1@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028201032.6352-2-jgg@ziepe.ca>

On 10/28/19 1:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> 
> Now that we have KERNEL_HEADER_TEST all headers are generally compile
> tested, so relying on makefile tricks to avoid compiling code that depends
> on CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER is more annoying.
> 
> Instead follow the usual pattern and provide most of the header with only
> the functions stubbed out when CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER is disabled. This
> ensures code compiles no matter what the config setting is.
> 
> While here, struct mmu_notifier_mm is private to mmu_notifier.c, move it.

and correct a minor spelling error in a comment. Good. :)

> 
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 46 +++++++++++++-----------------------
>  mm/mmu_notifier.c            | 13 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 

Because this is correct as-is, you can add:

Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>


...whether or not you take the following recommendation, which is:
you've only done part of the job of making struct mmu_notifier_mm 
private to mmu_notifier.c. There's more:

* struct mmu_notifier_mm is referred to in two places now: mm_types.h
  and (still) mmu_notifier.h. Therefore:

    a) Move the last two traces of it out of mmu_notifier.h, and

    b) Put a forward declaration in mm_types.h, which is where it
       belongs because that's where it's referred to.

So if you apply this incremental patch on top, I think it's where
you want to be:

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 2222fa795284..df93a3cc0da9 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 
 struct address_space;
 struct mem_cgroup;
+struct mmu_notifier_mm;
 
 /*
  * Each physical page in the system has a struct page associated with
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index 51b92ba013dd..84efd2c51f5c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
 #include <linux/srcu.h>
 #include <linux/interval_tree.h>
 
-struct mmu_notifier_mm;
 struct mmu_notifier;
 struct mmu_notifier_range;
 struct mmu_range_notifier;
@@ -263,10 +262,7 @@ struct mmu_notifier_range {
        enum mmu_notifier_event event;
 };
 
-static inline int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm)
-{
-       return unlikely(mm->mmu_notifier_mm);
-}
+int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm);
 
 struct mmu_notifier *mmu_notifier_get_locked(const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops,
                                             struct mm_struct *mm);
@@ -477,10 +473,7 @@ static inline void mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
                __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(mm, start, end);
 }
 
-static inline void mmu_notifier_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
-{
-       mm->mmu_notifier_mm = NULL;
-}
+void mmu_notifier_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm);
 
 static inline void mmu_notifier_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index 2b7485919ecf..107f9406a92d 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@ struct mmu_notifier_mm {
        struct hlist_head deferred_list;
 };
 
+int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+       return unlikely(mm->mmu_notifier_mm);
+}
+
+void mmu_notifier_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+       mm->mmu_notifier_mm = NULL;
+}
+
 /*
  * This is a collision-retry read-side/write-side 'lock', a lot like a
  * seqcount, however this allows multiple write-sides to hold it at


thanks,

John Hubbard
NVIDIA

> diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> index 1bd8e6a09a3c27..12bd603d318ce7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> @@ -7,8 +7,9 @@
>  #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>  #include <linux/srcu.h>
>  
> +struct mmu_notifier_mm;
>  struct mmu_notifier;
> -struct mmu_notifier_ops;
> +struct mmu_notifier_range;
>  
>  /**
>   * enum mmu_notifier_event - reason for the mmu notifier callback
> @@ -40,36 +41,8 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
>  	MMU_NOTIFY_SOFT_DIRTY,
>  };
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> -extern struct lockdep_map __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map;
> -#endif
> -
> -/*
> - * The mmu notifier_mm structure is allocated and installed in
> - * mm->mmu_notifier_mm inside the mm_take_all_locks() protected
> - * critical section and it's released only when mm_count reaches zero
> - * in mmdrop().
> - */
> -struct mmu_notifier_mm {
> -	/* all mmu notifiers registerd in this mm are queued in this list */
> -	struct hlist_head list;
> -	/* to serialize the list modifications and hlist_unhashed */
> -	spinlock_t lock;
> -};
> -
>  #define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE (1 << 0)
>  
> -struct mmu_notifier_range {
> -	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> -	struct mm_struct *mm;
> -	unsigned long start;
> -	unsigned long end;
> -	unsigned flags;
> -	enum mmu_notifier_event event;
> -};
> -
>  struct mmu_notifier_ops {
>  	/*
>  	 * Called either by mmu_notifier_unregister or when the mm is
> @@ -249,6 +222,21 @@ struct mmu_notifier {
>  	unsigned int users;
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> +extern struct lockdep_map __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map;
> +#endif
> +
> +struct mmu_notifier_range {
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> +	unsigned long start;
> +	unsigned long end;
> +	unsigned flags;
> +	enum mmu_notifier_event event;
> +};
> +
>  static inline int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	return unlikely(mm->mmu_notifier_mm);
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> index 7fde88695f35d6..367670cfd02b7b 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ struct lockdep_map __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map = {
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * The mmu notifier_mm structure is allocated and installed in
> + * mm->mmu_notifier_mm inside the mm_take_all_locks() protected
> + * critical section and it's released only when mm_count reaches zero
> + * in mmdrop().
> + */
> +struct mmu_notifier_mm {
> +	/* all mmu notifiers registered in this mm are queued in this list */
> +	struct hlist_head list;
> +	/* to serialize the list modifications and hlist_unhashed */
> +	spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * This function can't run concurrently against mmu_notifier_register
>   * because mm->mm_users > 0 during mmu_notifier_register and exit_mmap
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-28 20:10 [PATCH v2 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] mm/mmu_notifier: define the header pre-processor parts even if disabled Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-05 21:23   ` John Hubbard [this message]
2019-11-06 13:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] mm/mmu_notifier: add an interval tree notifier Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29 22:04   ` Kuehling, Felix
2019-10-29 22:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-07  0:23   ` John Hubbard
2019-11-07  2:08     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-11-07 20:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-07 21:04         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-11-08  0:32           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-08  2:00             ` Jerome Glisse
2019-11-08 20:19               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-07 20:06     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-07 20:53       ` John Hubbard
2019-11-08 15:26         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-08  6:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08 13:43         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] mm/hmm: allow hmm_range to be used with a mmu_range_notifier or hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] mm/hmm: define the pre-processor related parts of hmm.h even if disabled Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] RDMA/odp: Use mmu_range_notifier_insert() Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] RDMA/hfi1: Use mmu_range_notifier_inset for user_exp_rcv Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29 12:19   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-10-29 12:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/radeon: use mmu_range_notifier_insert Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29  7:48   ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] xen/gntdev: Use select for DMA_SHARED_BUFFER Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 18:26   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-05 14:44     ` Jürgen Groß
2019-11-07  9:39   ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] xen/gntdev: use mmu_range_notifier_insert Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-30 16:55   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-11-01 17:48     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 18:51       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-11-01 19:17         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-04 22:03   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-11-05  2:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-05 15:16       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-11-07 20:36         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-07 22:54           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-11-08 14:53             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] nouveau: use mmu_notifier directly for invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] nouveau: use mmu_range_notifier instead of hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/amdgpu: Call find_vma under mmap_sem Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29  7:49   ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-29 16:28   ` Kuehling, Felix
2019-10-29 13:07     ` Christian König
2019-10-29 17:19     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/amdgpu: Use mmu_range_insert instead of hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29  7:51   ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-29 13:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29 22:14   ` Kuehling, Felix
2019-10-29 23:09     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/amdgpu: Use mmu_range_notifier " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-29 19:22   ` Yang, Philip
2019-10-29 19:25     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 14:44       ` Yang, Philip
2019-11-01 15:12         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 15:59           ` Yang, Philip
2019-11-01 17:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 19:19               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 19:45               ` Yang, Philip
2019-11-01 19:50                 ` Yang, Philip
2019-11-01 19:51                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 18:21         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 18:34         ` [PATCH v2a " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] mm/hmm: remove hmm_mirror and related Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-01 20:54 ` Ralph Campbell
2019-11-04 20:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=770248ae-efa1-efae-a978-f52d8510f7b1@nvidia.com \
    --to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=David1.Zhou@amd.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=petrcvekcz@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).