linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-rc] RDMA/mlx5: Release locks during notifier unregister
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:51:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <805ad5c2714ad2fb4c9b92eb99a256e8998334f9.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190731180124.GE4832@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2799 bytes --]

On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 21:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:22:19PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 05:00:59PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:22:44PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > > > > > index c2a5780cb394..e12a4404096b 100644
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > > > > > @@ -5802,13 +5802,12 @@ static void
> > > > > > mlx5_ib_unbind_slave_port(struct
> > > > > > mlx5_ib_dev *ibdev,
> > > > > >  		return;
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -	if (mpi->mdev_events.notifier_call)
> > > > > > -		mlx5_notifier_unregister(mpi->mdev, &mpi-
> > > > > > >mdev_events);
> > > > > > -	mpi->mdev_events.notifier_call = NULL;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > >  	mpi->ibdev = NULL;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	spin_unlock(&port->mp.mpi_lock);
> > > > > > +	if (mpi->mdev_events.notifier_call)
> > > > > > +		mlx5_notifier_unregister(mpi->mdev, &mpi-
> > > > > > >mdev_events);
> > > > > > +	mpi->mdev_events.notifier_call = NULL;
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can see where this fixes the problem at hand, but this gives
> > > > > the
> > > > > appearance of creating a new race.  Doing a
> > > > > check/unregister/set-null
> > > > > series outside of any locks is a red flag to someone
> > > > > investigating the
> > > > > code.  You should at least make note of the fact that calling
> > > > > unregister
> > > > > more than once is safe.  If you're fine with it, I can add a
> > > > > comment and
> > > > > take the patch, or you can resubmit.
> > > > 
> > > > Mucking about notifier_call like that is gross anyhow, maybe
> > > > better to
> > > > delete it entirely.
> > > 
> > > What do you propose to delete?
> > 
> > The 'mpi->mdev_events.notifier_call = NULL;' and 'if
> > (mpi->mdev_events.notifier_call)'
> > 
> > Once it leaves the lock it stops doing anything useful.
> > 
> > If you need it, then we can't drop the lock, if you don't, it is
> > just
> > dead code, delete it.
> 
> This specific notifier_call is protected outside
> of mlx5_ib_unbind_slave_port() by mlx5_ib_multiport_mutex and NULL
> check
> is needed to ensure single call to mlx5_notifier_unregister, because
> calls to mlx5_ib_unbind_slave_port() will be serialized.

But looking at the code, it doesn't appear mlx5_notifier_unregister
requires there to only be a single call.  It's safe to call it multiple
times for the same notifier.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-31  8:38 [PATCH rdma-rc] RDMA/mlx5: Release locks during notifier unregister Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 16:22 ` Doug Ledford
2019-07-31 17:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-31 17:09     ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 17:22       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-31 18:01         ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 18:51           ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2019-08-01  8:22             ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-31 19:55           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-01  8:27             ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-01 12:00               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-01 12:08                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-01 14:16                   ` Doug Ledford
2019-08-01 15:59                     ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-01 16:11                       ` Doug Ledford
2019-08-01 16:20                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-01 16:40                           ` Doug Ledford
2019-08-01 16:43                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-01 16:50                               ` Doug Ledford
2019-08-01 17:31                                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-01 16:23                         ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-01 16:42                           ` Doug Ledford
2019-08-01 17:33                             ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-01 20:09                               ` Doug Ledford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=805ad5c2714ad2fb4c9b92eb99a256e8998334f9.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).