Hey Stephen,

> I have run our tests against this patch and it is working well for our
> "basic" testing as well. The test case that previously failed, now
> passes with this patch. So that's encouraging! Thanks for the quick
> response and quick patch.
> 
> One question we had is regarding the hard coded header length: What
> happens if the initiator sends an extended CDB, like a WRITE32? Are
> there any concerns with an additional header segment (AHS)?

Does the attached patch work for you?