linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: blktest/rxe almost working
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:41:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7557529-d07d-3e35-0f03-2bbe867af4a1@gmail.com> (raw)

Now that for-next is on 5.14.0-rc6+ blktest srp/002 is very close to working for rxe but there is
still one error. After adding MW support I added a test to local invalidate to check and see if the l/rkey matched the key actually contained in the MR/MW when local invalidate is called. This is failing
for srp/002 with the key portion of the rkey off by one. Looking at ib_srp.c I see code that does in fact
increment the rkey by one and also has code that posts a local invalidate. This was never checked before
and is now failing to match. If I mask off the key portion in the test the whole test case passes so
the other problems appear to have been fixed. If the increment and invalidate are out of sync this could
result in the error. I suspect this may be a bug in srp. Worst case I can remove this test but I would
rather not.

Bob

             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-02 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 21:41 Bob Pearson [this message]
2021-09-02 23:38 ` blktest/rxe almost working Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-03 22:18   ` Bob Pearson
2021-09-03 23:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-04 22:30       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-05 18:02         ` Bob Pearson
2021-09-07 12:01           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-07 16:35             ` Bob Pearson
2021-09-07 16:39               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-07 16:47                 ` Bob Pearson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7557529-d07d-3e35-0f03-2bbe867af4a1@gmail.com \
    --to=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).