From: Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: clew@codeaurora.org, sibis@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] soc: qcom: aoss: Expose send for generic usecase
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:14:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <926738e1-6786-aa6f-5a85-784d624575c7@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHYJVjvjUyXtrNmC@builder.lan>
On 4/14/2021 2:42 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 08 Apr 23:39 CDT 2021, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
> [..]
>> +/**
>> + * qmp_get() - get a qmp handle from a device
>> + * @dev: client device pointer
>> + *
>> + * Return: handle to qmp device on success, ERR_PTR() on failure
>> + */
>> +struct qmp *qmp_get(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + struct qmp *qmp;
>> +
>> + if (!dev || !dev->of_node)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "qcom,qmp", 0);
>> + if (!np)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
>> + if (!pdev)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + qmp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + return qmp ? qmp : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qmp_get);
>> +
>> +void qmp_put(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + platform_device_put(pdev);
> I was expecting that the devres allocated struct qmp would stick around
> until the struct device's release callback came. As described in my
> answer to Mani yesterday I was wrong.
>
> As such you need to make sure that struct qmp stays around until
> qmp_remove() and all qmp_put() calls has been made.
>
> I presume a reasonable way to achieve this is to not use devm to
> allocate our struct qmp, add a kref to the object. So this would have to
> be a kref_put() on that instead of the platform_device_put() I asked you
> to implement here.
>
> Sorry about that.
>
>
> The rest of the patch looks good.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
Hi Bjorn,
Even if we use kref_put(), would it not require platform_device_put()?
As per my understanding of_find_device_by_node(np) will increment
node/pdev kobj refcount which both needs to be decremented.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 4:39 [PATCH V2 0/2] soc: qcom: aoss: Expose send for generic usecase Deepak Kumar Singh
2021-04-09 4:39 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] " Deepak Kumar Singh
2021-04-13 21:12 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-05 7:44 ` Deepak Kumar Singh [this message]
2021-04-09 4:39 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] soc: qcom: aoss: Add debugfs entry Deepak Kumar Singh
2021-04-09 8:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=926738e1-6786-aa6f-5a85-784d624575c7@codeaurora.org \
--to=deesin@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=clew@codeaurora.org \
--cc=deesin@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).