From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Cc: kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com, airlied@linux.ie,
daniel@ffwll.ch, koji.matsuoka.xm@renesas.com, muroya@ksk.co.jp,
VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@in.bosch.com,
Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@in.bosch.com,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] drm: rcar-du: Add support for CMM
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 14:35:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190607113540.GB7593@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606142220.1392-15-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:22:14PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Add a driver for the R-Car Display Unit Color Correction Module.
>
> Each DU output channel is provided with a CMM unit to perform image
> enhancement and color correction.
I would say "On most Gen3 SoCs, each DU ..." as V3* SoCs have no CMM.
>
> Add support for CMM through a driver that supports configuration of
> the 1-dimensional LUT table. More advanced CMM feature could be
> implemented on top of this basic one.
s/could be/will be/ ? :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.h | 38 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
> index 1529849e217e..539d232790d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
> @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ config DRM_RCAR_DU
> Choose this option if you have an R-Car chipset.
> If M is selected the module will be called rcar-du-drm.
>
> +config DRM_RCAR_CMM
> + bool "R-Car DU Color Management Module (CMM) Support"
> + depends on DRM && OF
> + depends on DRM_RCAR_DU
> + help
> + Enable support for R-Car Color Management Module (CMM).
> +
> config DRM_RCAR_DW_HDMI
> tristate "R-Car DU Gen3 HDMI Encoder Support"
> depends on DRM && OF
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile
> index 6c2ed9c46467..4d1187ccc3e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ rcar-du-drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_LVDS) += rcar_du_of.o \
> rcar-du-drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_VSP) += rcar_du_vsp.o
> rcar-du-drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_WRITEBACK) += rcar_du_writeback.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_CMM) += rcar_cmm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU) += rcar-du-drm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DW_HDMI) += rcar_dw_hdmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_LVDS) += rcar_lvds.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5d9d917b91f4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * rcar_cmm.c -- R-Car Display Unit Color Management Module
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> +
> +#include "rcar_cmm.h"
> +
> +#define CM2_LUT_CTRL 0x00
I would write all register addresses with 3 (or 4) digits.
> +#define CM2_LUT_CTRL_EN BIT(0)
> +#define CM2_LUT_TBLA 0x600
I would define this as
#define CM2_LUT_TBLA(n) (0x600 + (n) * 4)
> +
> +struct rcar_cmm {
> + struct clk *clk;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + bool enabled;
> +
> + /* LUT table scratch buffer. */
> + struct {
> + bool restore;
> + unsigned int size;
> + uint32_t table[CMM_GAMMA_LUT_SIZE];
> + } lut;
> +};
> +
> +static inline int rcar_cmm_read(struct rcar_cmm *rcmm, u32 reg)
> +{
> + return ioread32(rcmm->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void rcar_cmm_write(struct rcar_cmm *rcmm, u32 reg, u32 data)
> +{
> + iowrite32(data, rcmm->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +int rcar_cmm_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, struct rcar_cmm_config *config)
Please document the functions exposed to the DU driver. It's hard to
understand the setup vs. enable/disable split by just reading this
driver.
> +{
> + struct rcar_cmm *rcmm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (config->lut.size > CMM_GAMMA_LUT_SIZE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * As cmm_setup is called by atomic commit tail helper, it might be
> + * called before the enabling the CRTC (which calls cmm_enable()).
> + *
> + * Store the LUT table entries in the scratch buffer to be later
> + * programmed at enable time.
> + */
> + if (!rcmm->enabled) {
> + if (!config->lut.enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < config->lut.size; ++i) {
> + struct drm_color_lut *lut = &config->lut.table[i];
> +
> + rcmm->lut.table[i] = (lut->red & 0xff) << 16 |
> + (lut->green & 0xff) << 8 |
> + (lut->blue & 0xff);
> + }
> +
> + rcmm->lut.restore = true;
> + rcmm->lut.size = config->lut.size;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (rcar_cmm_read(rcmm, CM2_LUT_CTRL) & CM2_LUT_CTRL_EN &&
> + !config->lut.enable) {
> + rcar_cmm_write(rcmm, CM2_LUT_CTRL, 0);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Enable LUT and program the new gamma table values. */
> + rcar_cmm_write(rcmm, CM2_LUT_CTRL, CM2_LUT_CTRL_EN);
Shouldn't you write the LUT contents before enabling it (same below) ?
> + for (i = 0; i < config->lut.size; ++i) {
> + struct drm_color_lut *lut = &config->lut.table[i];
> + u32 val = (lut->red & 0xff) << 16 | (lut->green & 0xff) << 8 |
> + (lut->blue & 0xff);
Do you need to recompute the value, can't you use rcmm->lut.table ?
> +
> + rcar_cmm_write(rcmm, CM2_LUT_TBLA + i * 4, val);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
You need to export this and the next two functions.
> +
> +int rcar_cmm_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rcar_cmm *rcmm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (rcmm->enabled)
> + return 0;
Can this happen without a bug in the caller ? If it can, and assuming
the caller balances the enable and disable calls, you will have
unbalanced clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() calls.
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(rcmm->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Could you use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead ?
> +
> + /* Apply the LUT table values saved at cmm_setup time. */
> + if (rcmm->lut.restore) {
> + rcar_cmm_write(rcmm, CM2_LUT_CTRL, CM2_LUT_CTRL_EN);
> + for (i = 0; i < rcmm->lut.size; ++i)
> + rcar_cmm_write(rcmm, CM2_LUT_TBLA + i * 4,
> + rcmm->lut.table[i]);
> +
> + rcmm->lut.restore = false;
> + rcmm->lut.size = 0;
> + }
> +
> + rcmm->enabled = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void rcar_cmm_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rcar_cmm *rcmm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + rcar_cmm_write(rcmm, CM2_LUT_CTRL, 0);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(rcmm->clk);
> +
> + rcmm->lut.restore = false;
> + rcmm->lut.size = 0;
> + rcmm->enabled = false;
> +}
> +
> +static int rcar_cmm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rcar_cmm *rcmm;
> + struct resource *res;
> + resource_size_t size;
> +
> + rcmm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rcmm), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rcmm)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rcmm);
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + size = resource_size(res);
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, size,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev))) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "can't request region for resource %pR\n", res);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + rcmm->base = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start, size);
> + if (IS_ERR(rcmm->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(rcmm->base);
Anything wrong with devm_ioremap_resource() ?
> +
> + rcmm->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(rcmm->clk)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get CMM clock");
> + return PTR_ERR(rcmm->clk);
> + }
> +
> + rcmm->lut.restore = false;
> + rcmm->lut.size = 0;
> + rcmm->enabled = false;
As you allocate memory with kzalloc() you could skip this.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rcar_cmm_of_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "renesas,cmm-gen3" },
> + { .compatible = "renesas,cmm-gen2" },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rcar_cmm_of_table);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rcar_cmm_platform_driver = {
> + .probe = rcar_cmm_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "rcar-cmm",
> + .of_match_table = rcar_cmm_of_table,
> + },
No need for suspend/resume support ? The DU driver should disable/enable
the CMM in its suspend/resume paths, so this should be fine, but won't
the LUT contents be lost and need to be restored ?
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(rcar_cmm_platform_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org");
Missing >.
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Renesas R-Car CMM Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..da61a145dc5c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_cmm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
The .c and .h file licenses don't match.
> +/*
> + * rcar_cmm.h -- R-Car Display Unit Color Management Module
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __RCAR_CMM_H__
> +#define __RCAR_CMM_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
You can forward-declare struct platform_device instead.
> +
> +#define CMM_GAMMA_LUT_SIZE 256
> +
> +struct drm_color_lut;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct rcar_cmm_config - CMM configuration
> + *
> + * @lut: 1D-LUT configuration
> + * @lut.enable: 1D-LUT enable flag
> + * @lut.table: 1D-LUT table entries.
> + * @lut.size 1D-LUT number of entries. Max is 256
The last line is missing a colon.
> + */
> +struct rcar_cmm_config {
> + struct {
> + bool enable;
> + struct drm_color_lut *table;
> + unsigned int size;
> + } lut;
> +};
> +
> +int rcar_cmm_enable(struct platform_device *);
As the OF API looks up a struct device from a device_node, should we use
struct device here ?
> +void rcar_cmm_disable(struct platform_device *);
I find headers more readable when function arguments are named. In this
case the types probably provide enough information, but good luck trying
to read a function such as
int foo(int, int, bool);
> +
> +int rcar_cmm_setup(struct platform_device *, struct rcar_cmm_config *);
Can the second argument be const ?
> +
> +#endif /* __RCAR_CMM_H__ */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-07 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-06 14:22 [PATCH 00/20] drm: rcar-du: Add Color Management Module (CMM) Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 01/20] dt-bindings: display: renesas,cmm: Add R-Car CMM documentation Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 16:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 18:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06 20:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 02/20] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Document cmms property Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 16:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 03/20] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Update 'vsps' in example Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 16:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 20:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-07 11:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/20] clk: renesas: r8a7796: Add CMM clocks Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/20] clk: renesas: r8a7795: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 16:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 18:18 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-12 7:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/20] clk: renesas: r8a77965: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 16:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-12 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/20] clk: renesas: r8a77990: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-12 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/20] clk: renesas: r8a77995: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-12 7:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/20] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7796: Add CMM units Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/20] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/20] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77965: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/20] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77990: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 13/20] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: " Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 17:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm: rcar-du: Add support for CMM Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 11:35 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2019-06-07 11:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-07 12:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-14 8:54 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm: rcar-du: Claim CMM support for Gen3 SoCs Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 11:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm: rcar-du: kms: Collect CMM instances Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 11:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm: rcar-du: crtc: Enable and disable CMMs Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 11:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm: rcar-du: group: Enable DU's CMM extension Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 11:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm: rcar-du: crtc: Register GAMMA_LUT properties Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 12:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-14 8:15 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-14 8:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-14 9:27 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-14 14:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm: rcar-du: kms: Update CMM in atomic commit tail Jacopo Mondi
2019-06-07 12:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-06-14 8:19 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-12 23:39 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190607113540.GB7593@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@in.bosch.com \
--cc=VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@in.bosch.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=koji.matsuoka.xm@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muroya@ksk.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).