linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	linux-mm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	greentime.hu@sifive.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Clark <michaeljclark@mac.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] RISC-V: Implement sparsemem
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:56:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d81412d-73fc-fa56-6f84-dedda72b9cc6@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEbi=3f+JDywuHYspfYKuC8z2wm8inRenBz+3DYbKK3ixFjU_g@mail.gmail.com>



On 2019-08-14 7:35 a.m., Greentime Hu wrote:
> Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> 於 2019年8月14日 週三 上午12:50寫道:
>>
>> On 2019-08-13 10:39 a.m., Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2019-08-13 12:04 a.m., Greentime Hu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Every architecture with mmu defines their own pfn_valid().
>>>>
>>>> Not true. Arm64, for example just uses the generic implementation in
>>>> mmzone.h.
>>>
>>> arm64 seems to define their own:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig#n899
>>
>> Oh, yup. My mistake.
>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/mm/init.c#n235
>>>
>>> While there are many architectures which have their own pfn_valid();
>>> oddly, almost none of them set HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID ?
>>
>> Yes, much of this is super confusing. Seems HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID only
>> matters if SPARSEMEM is set. So risc-v probably doesn't need to set it
>> and we just need a #ifdef !CONFIG_FLATMEM around the pfn_valid
>> definition like other arches.
>>
> 
> Maybe this commit explains why it used HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID instead of SPARSEMEM.
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7b7bf499f79de3f6c85a340c8453a78789523f85
> 
> BTW, I found another issue here.
> #define FIXADDR_TOP            (VMALLOC_START)
> #define FIXADDR_START           (FIXADDR_TOP - FIXADDR_SIZE)
> #define VMEMMAP_END    (VMALLOC_START - 1)
> #define VMEMMAP_START  (VMALLOC_START - VMEMMAP_SIZE)
> These 2 regions are overlapped.
> 
> How about this fix? Not sure if it is good for everyone.

Yes, this looks good to me. I can fold these changes into my patch and
send a v5 to the list.

Thanks!

Logan


> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 3f12b069af1d..3c4d394679d0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -115,9 +115,6 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS
>         default 3 if 64BIT
>         default 2
> 
> -config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> -       def_bool y
> -
>  menu "Platform type"
> 
>  choice
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/fixmap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/fixmap.h
> index c207f6634b91..72e106b60bc5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/fixmap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/fixmap.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ enum fixed_addresses {
>  };
> 
>  #define FIXADDR_SIZE           (__end_of_fixed_addresses * PAGE_SIZE)
> -#define FIXADDR_TOP            (VMALLOC_START)
> +#define FIXADDR_TOP            (VMEMMAP_START)
>  #define FIXADDR_START          (FIXADDR_TOP - FIXADDR_SIZE)
> 
>  #define FIXMAP_PAGE_IO         PAGE_KERNEL
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> index 8ddb6c7fedac..83830997dce6 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -100,8 +100,10 @@ extern unsigned long min_low_pfn;
>  #define page_to_bus(page)      (page_to_phys(page))
>  #define phys_to_page(paddr)    (pfn_to_page(phys_to_pfn(paddr)))
> 
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM)
>  #define pfn_valid(pfn) \
>         (((pfn) >= pfn_base) && (((pfn)-pfn_base) < max_mapnr))
> +#endif
> 
>  #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET                (pfn_base)


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-09 20:39 [PATCH v4 0/2] [PATCH v2 0/6] sparsemem support for RISC-V Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 20:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-15 13:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-15 17:30     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 20:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] RISC-V: Implement sparsemem Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-15 13:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-31  6:30   ` Greentime Hu
2019-07-31 17:07     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-01  3:34       ` Greentime Hu
     [not found]         ` <CAEbi=3eZcgWevpX9VO9ohgxVDFVprk_t52Xbs3-TdtZ+js3NVA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-08-09 15:46           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-09 17:01             ` Greentime Hu
2019-08-09 19:03               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-12  4:01                 ` Greentime Hu
2019-08-12 15:51                   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-13  6:04                     ` Greentime Hu
2019-08-13 16:14                       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-13 16:39                         ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-13 16:48                           ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-13 16:49                           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-14 13:35                             ` Greentime Hu
2019-08-14 16:56                               ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-14 17:40                                 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-14 17:46                                   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-14 20:09                                     ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-14 22:21                               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-15  9:31                                 ` Greentime Hu
2019-08-15 16:20                                   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-16  2:07                                     ` Greentime Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0d81412d-73fc-fa56-6f84-dedda72b9cc6@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=andrew@sifive.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michaeljclark@mac.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).