From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: keescook@chromium.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com
Cc: ndesaulniers@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gustavoars@kernel.org, linux@leemhuis.info,
heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
joanbrugueram@gmail.com, masahiroy@kernel.org,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
hi@alyssa.is, palmer@dabbelt.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv/purgatory: Do not use fortified string functions
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:27:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <168564402237.2891605.1600418987887898293.b4-ty@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601160025.gonna.868-kees@kernel.org>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:00:28 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> With the addition of -fstrict-flex-arrays=3, struct sha256_state's
> trailing array is no longer ignored by CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> struct sha256_state {
> u32 state[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE / 4];
> u64 count;
> u8 buf[SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE];
> };
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!
[1/1] riscv/purgatory: Do not use fortified string functions
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ca2ca08f479d
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 16:00 [PATCH v2] riscv/purgatory: Do not use fortified string functions Kees Cook
2023-06-01 17:34 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-01 18:27 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-06-01 20:17 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-01 20:31 ` Kees Cook
2023-06-01 21:04 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-01 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=168564402237.2891605.1600418987887898293.b4-ty@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
--cc=hi@alyssa.is \
--cc=joanbrugueram@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).