linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Qingfang DENG <dqfext@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] riscv: enable EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 12:42:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231225044207.3821-1-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)

Some riscv implementations such as T-HEAD's C906, C908, C910 and C920
support efficient unaligned access, for performance reason we want
to enable HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS on these platforms. To
avoid performance regressions on non efficient unaligned access
platforms, HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS can't be globally selected.

To solve this problem, runtime code patching based on the detected
speed is a good solution. But that's not easy, it involves lots of
work to modify vairous subsystems such as net, mm, lib and so on.
This can be done step by step.

So let's take an easier solution: add support to efficient unaligned
access and hide the support under NONPORTABLE.

patch1 introduces RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS which depends on
NONPORTABLE, if users know during config time that the kernel will be
only run on those efficient unaligned access hw platforms, they can
enable it. Obviously, generic unified kernel Image shouldn't enable it.

patch2 adds support DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS when MMU and
RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.

Below test program and step shows how much performance can be improved:

 $ cat tt.c
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <unistd.h>

 #define ITERATIONS 1000000

 #define PATH "123456781234567812345678123456781"

 int main(void)
 {
         unsigned long i;
         struct stat buf;

         for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++)
                 stat(PATH, &buf);

         return 0;
 }

 $ gcc -O2 tt.c
 $ touch 123456781234567812345678123456781
 $ time ./a.out

Per my test on T-HEAD C910 platforms, the above test performance is
improved by about 7.5%.

Since v3:
  - adopt Eric's suggestions, such as better Kconfig help msg and so on.

Since v2:
  - Don't set "-mstrict-align" CFLAGS if HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
  - collect Reviewed-by tag

Since v1:
  - fix typo in commit msg
  - fix build error if NOMMU


Jisheng Zhang (2):
  riscv: introduce RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
  riscv: select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS for efficient unaligned access HW

 arch/riscv/Kconfig                      | 14 +++++++++++
 arch/riscv/Makefile                     |  2 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-extable.h    | 15 ++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/mm/extable.c                 | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+)

-- 
2.40.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2023-12-25  4:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-25  4:42 Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2023-12-25  4:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: introduce RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Jisheng Zhang
2023-12-27  4:22   ` Eric Biggers
2023-12-27 10:41   ` David Laight
2023-12-25  4:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] riscv: select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS for efficient unaligned access HW Jisheng Zhang
2024-01-11 14:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] riscv: enable EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231225044207.3821-1-jszhang@kernel.org \
    --to=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).