linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
To: "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] riscv: ftrace: make stack walk more robust.
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:40:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240328184020.34278-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> (raw)

The current stack walker in riscv implemented in walk_stackframe() provides
the PC to a callback function when it unwinds the stacks. This doesn't
allow implementing stack walkers that need access to more information like
the frame pointer, etc.

This series makes walk_stackframe() provide a unwinde_state structure to
callback functions. This structure has all the information that
walk_stackframe() can provide.

Currently, there are four users of walk_stackframe(): return_address(),
perf_callchain_kernel(), dump_backtrace(), and __get_wchan(). All of these
have been converted to use arch_stack_walk() rather than calling
walk_stackframe() directly.

We need this to implement arch_bpf_stack_walk() that provides a callback
that needs the FP, SP, and PC. This will be needed for implementing BFP
exceptions for RISCV.

There are no functional changes in this series.

I have tested this by crashing the kernel and looking at the stack trace
with and without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER

Puranjay Mohan (2):
  riscv: stacktrace: use arch_stack_walk() in place of walk_stackframe
  riscv: stacktrace: make walk_stackframe() more robust

 arch/riscv/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  2 -
 arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c  |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.40.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-28 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28 18:40 Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2024-03-28 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: stacktrace: use arch_stack_walk() in place of walk_stackframe Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-02 13:19   ` Björn Töpel
2024-03-28 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv: stacktrace: make walk_stackframe() more robust Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-02 13:20   ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] riscv: ftrace: make stack walk " Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240328184020.34278-1-puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --to=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).