linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>
To: Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] riscv: remove duplicate macros from ptrace.h
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:03:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a436f2edd8c1ad0ae32ec05415475e9@mailhost.ics.forth.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e0db47120668612b1814504a7054462@mailhost.ics.forth.gr>

Στις 2019-04-11 18:55, Nick Kossifidis έγραψε:
> Στις 2019-04-11 18:46, Nick Kossifidis έγραψε:
>> Στις 2019-04-11 14:56, Christoph Hellwig έγραψε:
>>> No need to have two names for the same thing.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h | 21 ++++++---------------
>>>  arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c  |  8 ++++----
>>>  arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c       |  2 +-
>>>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h 
>>> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> index d35ec2f41381..9c867a4bac83 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> @@ -70,47 +70,38 @@ struct pt_regs {
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  /* Helpers for working with the instruction pointer */
>>> -#define GET_IP(regs) ((regs)->sepc)
>>> -#define SET_IP(regs, val) (GET_IP(regs) = (val))
>>> -
>>>  static inline unsigned long instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs 
>>> *regs)
>>>  {
>>> -	return GET_IP(regs);
>>> +	return regs->sepc;
>>>  }
>>>  static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
>>>  					   unsigned long val)
>>>  {
>>> -	SET_IP(regs, val);
>>> +	regs->sepc = val;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  #define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs)
>>> 
>>>  /* Helpers for working with the user stack pointer */
>>> -#define GET_USP(regs) ((regs)->sp)
>>> -#define SET_USP(regs, val) (GET_USP(regs) = (val))
>>> -
>>>  static inline unsigned long user_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>  {
>>> -	return GET_USP(regs);
>>> +	return regs->sp;
>>>  }
>>>  static inline void user_stack_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
>>>  					  unsigned long val)
>>>  {
>>> -	SET_USP(regs, val);
>>> +	regs->sp =  val;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  /* Helpers for working with the frame pointer */
>>> -#define GET_FP(regs) ((regs)->s0)
>>> -#define SET_FP(regs, val) (GET_FP(regs) = (val))
>>> -
>>>  static inline unsigned long frame_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>  {
>>> -	return GET_FP(regs);
>>> +	return regs->s0;
>>>  }
>>>  static inline void frame_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
>>>  				     unsigned long val)
>>>  {
>>> -	SET_FP(regs, val);
>>> +	regs->s0 = val;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c 
>>> b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
>>> index a4b1d94371a0..25fe0ff81f9e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
>>> @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ static void notrace walk_stackframe(struct 
>>> task_struct *task,
>>>  	unsigned long fp, sp, pc;
>>> 
>>>  	if (regs) {
>>> -		fp = GET_FP(regs);
>>> -		sp = GET_USP(regs);
>>> -		pc = GET_IP(regs);
>>> +		fp = frame_pointer(regs);
>>> +		sp = user_stack_pointer(regs);
>>> +		pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
>>>  	} else if (task == NULL || task == current) {
>>>  		const register unsigned long current_sp __asm__ ("sp");
>>>  		fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
>>> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void notrace walk_stackframe(struct 
>>> task_struct *task,
>>> 
>>>  	if (regs) {
>>>  		sp = GET_USP(regs);
> 
> Ah just noticed this, it should be user_stack_pointer(regs) instead
> since you removed
> GET_USP.
> 
>>> -		pc = GET_IP(regs);
>>> +		pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
>>>  	} else if (task == NULL || task == current) {
>>>  		const register unsigned long current_sp __asm__ ("sp");
>>>  		sp = current_sp;
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>>> index 24a9333dda2c..86731a2fa218 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void do_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int signo, int 
>>> code,
>>>  	    && printk_ratelimit()) {
>>>  		pr_info("%s[%d]: unhandled signal %d code 0x%x at 0x" REG_FMT,
>>>  			tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), signo, code, addr);
>>> -		print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", GET_IP(regs));
>>> +		print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", instruction_pointer(regs));
>>>  		pr_cont("\n");
>>>  		show_regs(regs);
>>>  	}
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

I'm sorry I added the Reviewed-by tag too soon, I'm all in for the 
cleanup but I
believe it's much simpler, all of these are re-defined on
include/asm-generic/ptrace.h anyway, all we have to do is define GET_FP 
and GET_USP
(or rename regs->sp to regs->usp).

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-11 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-11 11:56 misc cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] riscv: use asm-generic/extable.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 19:00   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] riscv: remove dead big endian code Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 15:40   ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 15:47     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 16:08       ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 16:31         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 16:47           ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-12  6:07             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] riscv: remove CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_A Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 12:21   ` Andreas Schwab
2019-04-12  1:23     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-04-12  5:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] riscv: turn mm_segment_t into a struct Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] riscv: simplify stack pointer setup in head.S Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 20:54   ` Atish Patra
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] riscv: also clear all pending interrupts when booting Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 15:43   ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 18:52   ` Atish Patra
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] riscv: remove duplicate macros from ptrace.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 15:46   ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 15:55     ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 16:03       ` Nick Kossifidis [this message]
2019-04-11 16:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 16:38           ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 16:06       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 19:13   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-04-25 19:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 20:05       ` Paul Walmsley
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] riscv: print the unexpected interrupt cause Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 15:52   ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-04-11 15:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 18:59   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-04-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] riscv: call pm_power_off from machine_halt / machine_power_off Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 18:53   ` Atish Patra
2019-04-25 19:57   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-05-21 10:33   ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a436f2edd8c1ad0ae32ec05415475e9@mailhost.ics.forth.gr \
    --to=mick@ics.forth.gr \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).