From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Pu Lehui" <pulehui@huawei.com>
Cc: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Luke Nelson" <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
"Xi Wang" <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend return values
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dbba8a3-b07c-5247-f2c1-c6b484e9a16e@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004120706.52848-1-bjorn@kernel.org>
On 10/4/23 2:07 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
[...]
> The following test_progs now pass, which were previously broken:
>
> | 13 bpf_cookie
> | 19 bpf_mod_race
> | 68 deny_namespace
> | 119 libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
> | 135 lookup_key
> | 137 lsm_cgroup
> | 284 test_lsm
Thanks for the fixes, took them into bpf tree. I was wondering whether this could be
backed by specific tests, but looks like the above list already takes care of it.
Thanks,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-04 12:07 [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend return values Björn Töpel
2023-10-04 12:07 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] riscv, bpf: Sign-extend " Björn Töpel
2023-10-04 12:07 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] riscv, bpf: Track both a0 (RISC-V ABI) and a5 (BPF) " Björn Töpel
2023-10-09 13:27 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2023-10-09 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6dbba8a3-b07c-5247-f2c1-c6b484e9a16e@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).