linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	uclinux-dev@uclinux.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] mm: stub out all of swapops.h for !CONFIG_MMU
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:36:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80d01a1d-b6b0-18e8-811c-71af14cba3b9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611141841.GA29151@lst.de>

On 6/11/19 3:18 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:15:44AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 6/10/19 11:16 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> The whole header file deals with swap entries and PTEs, none of which
>>> can exist for nommu builds.
>>
>> Although I agree with the patch, I'm wondering how you get into it?
> 
> Without that the RISC-V nommu blows up like this:
> 
> 
> In file included from mm/vmscan.c:58:
> ./include/linux/swapops.h: In function ‘pte_to_swp_entry’:
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:71:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__pte_to_swp_entry’; did you mean ‘pte_to_swp_entry’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   arch_entry = __pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                pte_to_swp_entry
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:71:13: error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘swp_entry_t’ {aka ‘struct <anonymous>’} from type ‘int’
>   arch_entry = __pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>              ^
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:72:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__swp_type’; did you mean ‘swp_type’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   return swp_entry(__swp_type(arch_entry), __swp_offset(arch_entry));
>                    ^~~~~~~~~~
>                    swp_type
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:72:43: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__swp_offset’; did you mean ‘swp_offset’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   return swp_entry(__swp_type(arch_entry), __swp_offset(arch_entry));
>                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>                                            swp_offset
> ./include/linux/swapops.h: In function ‘swp_entry_to_pte’:
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:83:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__swp_entry’; did you mean ‘swp_entry’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   arch_entry = __swp_entry(swp_type(entry), swp_offset(entry));
>                ^~~~~~~~~~~
>                swp_entry
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:83:13: error: incompatible types when assigning to type ‘swp_entry_t’ {aka ‘struct <anonymous>’} from type ‘int’
>   arch_entry = __swp_entry(swp_type(entry), swp_offset(entry));
>              ^
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:84:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__swp_entry_to_pte’; did you mean ‘swp_entry_to_pte’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   return __swp_entry_to_pte(arch_entry);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          swp_entry_to_pte
> ./include/linux/swapops.h:84:9: error: incompatible types when returning type ‘int’ but ‘pte_t’ {aka ‘struct <anonymous>’} was expected
>   return __swp_entry_to_pte(arch_entry);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:278: mm/vmscan.o] Error 1
> make: *** [Makefile:1071: mm] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 

It looks like NOMMU ports tend to define those. For ARM they are:

#define __swp_type(x)           (0)
#define __swp_offset(x)         (0)
#define __swp_entry(typ,off)    ((swp_entry_t) { ((typ) | ((off) << 7)) })
#define __pte_to_swp_entry(pte) ((swp_entry_t) { pte_val(pte) })
#define __swp_entry_to_pte(x)   ((pte_t) { (x).val })

Anyway, I have no strong opinion on which is better :)

Cheers
Vladimir

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-10 22:16 RISC-V nommu support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: provide a print_vma_addr stub for !CONFIG_MMU Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:11   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: stub out all of swapops.h " Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:15   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 14:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 14:36       ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2019-06-14  9:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm/nommu: fix the MAP_UNINITIALIZED flag Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:19   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 04/17] irqchip/sifive-plic: set max threshold for ignored handlers Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 05/17] riscv: use CSR_SATP instead of the legacy sptbr name in switch_mm Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 06/17] riscv: clear the instruction cache and all registers when booting Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 07/17] riscv: refactor the IPI code Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 08/17] riscv: abstract out CSR names for supervisor vs machine mode Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 09/17] riscv: improve the default power off implementation Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 10/17] riscv: provide a flat entry loader Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 11/17] riscv: read hart ID from mhartid on boot Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 12/17] riscv: provide native clint access for M-mode Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 13/17] riscv: implement remote sfence.i natively " Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 14/17] riscv: poison SBI calls " Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 15/17] riscv: don't allow selecting SBI-based drivers " Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 16/17] riscv: use the correct interrupt levels " Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 22:16 ` [PATCH 17/17] riscv: add nommu support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:32   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11 12:44   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-24  5:42 RISC-V nommu support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24  5:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: stub out all of swapops.h for !CONFIG_MMU Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80d01a1d-b6b0-18e8-811c-71af14cba3b9@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).