From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: w@1wt.eu
Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
thomas@t-8ch.de
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/12] nolibc: add generic part1 of prepare for rv32
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 15:59:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1685777982.git.falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)
Hi, Willy
This is the v3 generic part1 for rv32, all of the found issues of v2
part1 [1] have been fixed up, several generic patches have been fixed up
and merged from v2 part2 [2] to this series, the standalone test_fork
patch [4] is merged with a Reviewed-by line into this series too.
This series is based on 20230528-nolibc-rv32+stkp5 branch of [5].
Changes from v2 -> v3:
* selftests/nolibc: fix up compile warning with glibc on x86_64
Use simpler 'long long' conversion instead of old #ifdef ...
(Suggestion from Willy)
* tools/nolibc: add missing nanoseconds support for __NR_statx
Split the compound assignment into two single assignments
(Suggestion from Thomas)
* selftests/nolibc: add new gettimeofday test cases
Removed the gettimeofday(NULL, &tz)
(Suggestion from Thomas)
All of the commit messages have been re-checked, some missing
Suggested-by lines are added.
The whole patchset have been tested on arm, aarch64, rv32 and rv64, no
regressions (the next compile patchset is required to do rv32 test).
The nolibc-test has been tested with glibc on x86_64 too.
Btw, we have found such poll failures on arm (not introduced by this
patchset), this will be fixed in our coming ppoll_time64 patchset:
48 poll_null = -1 ENOSYS [FAIL]
49 poll_stdout = -1 ENOSYS [FAIL]
50 poll_fault = -1 ENOSYS != (-1 EFAULT) [FAIL]
And the gettimeofday_null removal patch from Thomas [3] may conflicts
with the gettimeofday removal and addition patches, but it is not hard
to fix.
Best regards,
Zhangjin
---
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/cover.1685362482.git.falcon@tinylab.org/T/#t
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/cover.1685387484.git.falcon@tinylab.org/T/#t
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230530-nolibc-gettimeofday-v1-1-7307441a002b@weissschuh.net/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/61bdfe7bacebdef8aa9195f6f2550a5b0d33aab3.1685426545.git.falcon@tinylab.org/
[5]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wtarreau/nolibc.git
Zhangjin Wu (12):
selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx
tools/nolibc: add missing nanoseconds support for __NR_statx
selftests/nolibc: allow specify extra arguments for qemu
selftests/nolibc: fix up compile warning with glibc on x86_64
selftests/nolibc: not include limits.h for nolibc
selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__
tools/nolibc: arm: add missing my_syscall6
tools/nolibc: open: fix up compile warning for arm
selftests/nolibc: support two errnos with EXPECT_SYSER2()
selftests/nolibc: remove gettimeofday_bad1/2 completely
selftests/nolibc: add new gettimeofday test cases
selftests/nolibc: test_fork: fix up duplicated print
tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h | 23 +++++++++++
tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h | 14 +++++++
tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 39 +++++++++---------
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 42 ++++++++++++--------
5 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-03 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-03 7:59 Zhangjin Wu [this message]
2023-06-03 8:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use generic __NR_statx Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] tools/nolibc: add missing nanoseconds support for __NR_statx Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-04 11:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-04 12:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-04 12:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-03 8:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] selftests/nolibc: allow specify extra arguments for qemu Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] selftests/nolibc: fix up compile warning with glibc on x86_64 Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] selftests/nolibc: not include limits.h for nolibc Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__ Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] tools/nolibc: arm: add missing my_syscall6 Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:11 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] tools/nolibc: open: fix up compile warning for arm Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:13 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] selftests/nolibc: support two errnos with EXPECT_SYSER2() Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] selftests/nolibc: remove gettimeofday_bad1/2 completely Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:16 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] selftests/nolibc: add new gettimeofday test cases Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-04 6:46 ` Thomas Weißschuh
[not found] ` <tencent_4668A50A08C3D31E7531619E@qq.com>
2023-06-04 9:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-06-04 11:27 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-04 11:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-06-04 11:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-05 11:12 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-03 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] selftests/nolibc: test_fork: fix up duplicated print Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-04 6:49 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] nolibc: add generic part1 of prepare for rv32 Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-04 12:54 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1685777982.git.falcon@tinylab.org \
--to=falcon@tinylab.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).