From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:46:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8386046a-f673-b134-89ad-0117c70aaa51@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220094435.GU6003@pengutronix.de>
On 2021-12-20 09:44, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:09:18PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> This patch allows to let a domain be supplied by a regulator which
>> is needed for the GPU on the rk3568-EVB board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> +
>> + regulator_disable(pd->regulator);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int rockchip_pd_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>> @@ -500,6 +517,11 @@ static int rockchip_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> pd->info = pd_info;
>> pd->pmu = pd_info->pmu;
>>
>> + pd->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");
>
> I was told that I should use this function instead of
> devm_regulator_get_optional() when the regulator is not optional and
> also I can drop the if (pd->regulator) dance when enabling the regulator
> because I get a dummy regulator here when using devm_regulator_get().
>
> Well, all true and on one specific board the regulator is indeed not
> optional. However, on all other power domains that don't need a
> regulator and all other boards and all other SoCs this driver is used we
> now get:
>
> [ 0.185588] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.8: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.186036] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.9: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.186459] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.10: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.187039] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.11: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.187333] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.13: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.187644] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.14: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.188042] rk-power-domain rk-power-domain.15: supply power not found, using dummy regulator
>
> I wonder if devm_regulator_get() is really the right function here. Or
> should the message be dropped?
Since the power domains are hierarchical and none of them really
represent the physical owner of a supply, I'm not sure there's really a
correct answer to the regulator question either way in this context.
FWIW I reckon it would make sense to model things properly and teach the
driver about the voltage domains that actually own the input supplies
(maybe with a binding more like I/O domains where we just have
explicitly-named supply properties for each one on the power
controller?) - it's a little more work up-front, but seems like it
should be relatively straightforward to fit into the genpd hierarchy,
and be more robust in the long term.
Robin.
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 13:09 [PATCH 0/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: register device for each domain Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Use devm_clk_bulk_get_all() Sascha Hauer
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add regulator support Sascha Hauer
2021-12-20 9:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-20 10:46 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-12-20 12:56 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-20 12:53 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 10:40 ` Sascha Hauer
2021-12-22 12:54 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22 13:00 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:19 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-22 13:25 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-22 13:29 ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-22 13:37 ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-22 13:40 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-23 8:51 ` Michael Riesch
2021-12-17 13:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Add power-supply to domain nodes Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8386046a-f673-b134-89ad-0117c70aaa51@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).