linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
To: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@nxp.com>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rt: cpufreq: Fix cpu hotplug hang
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:44:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210219084420.23379-1-ran.wang_1@nxp.com> (raw)

When selecting PREEMPT_RT, cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy) might got
stuck due to irq_work_sync() pending for work on lazy_list. That’s
because lazy_list may have no chance to be served in softirq context
sometimes. Below is one of scenarios that was captured:

...
ret_from_fork
 kthread
  smpboot_thread_fn
   cpuhp_thread_fun
    cpuhp_invoke_callback: state: 193
     cpuhp_cpufreq_online
      cpufreq_online
       cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
        cpufreq_dbs_governor_stop
         sugov_stop  // kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
          irq_work_sync(&sg_policy->irq_work);

This is observed on LX2160ARDB (16 A72 cores) with cpufreq governor of
‘schedutil’ or ‘ondemand’.

Configure related irqwork to run on raw-irq context could fix this.

Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 63f7c219062b..731a7b1434df 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *poli
 	policy_dbs->policy = policy;
 	mutex_init(&policy_dbs->update_mutex);
 	atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0);
-	init_irq_work(&policy_dbs->irq_work, dbs_irq_work);
+	policy_dbs->irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(dbs_irq_work);
 	INIT_WORK(&policy_dbs->work, dbs_work_handler);
 
 	/* Set policy_dbs for all CPUs, online+offline */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 6931f0cdeb80..054a01ef4f57 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 
 	sg_policy->thread = thread;
 	kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
-	init_irq_work(&sg_policy->irq_work, sugov_irq_work);
+	sg_policy->irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(sugov_irq_work);
 	mutex_init(&sg_policy->work_lock);
 
 	wake_up_process(thread);
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-19  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-19  8:44 Ran Wang [this message]
2021-02-22 14:01 ` [PATCH] rt: cpufreq: Fix cpu hotplug hang Sebastian Siewior
2021-02-23  2:26   ` Ran Wang
2021-02-23  3:13     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-02-24 16:37       ` Sebastian Siewior
2021-02-25  2:31         ` Ran Wang
2021-03-23  7:00         ` Ran Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210219084420.23379-1-ran.wang_1@nxp.com \
    --to=ran.wang_1@nxp.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jiafei.pan@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).