linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	john.ogness@linutronix.de, Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.0.3-rt1
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:52:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <791056c4-3575-0bd8-031e-44d0e3b21e54@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190320171511.icjhdlulgal2yeho@linutronix.de>

Hi,

Apologies for a possible stupid question.

On 20/03/2019 17:15, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>    - Applied John Ogness' prinkt rework. One visible change is the
>      output during boot. Under the hood and for RT: By default, output
>      that is created at KERN_WARN[0] or higher is printed immediately if the
>      console supports "atomic" print (currently the 8250 driver does).
>      This output is printed immediately (and visible) even from IRQ-off
>      or preempt-disabled regions which wasn't the case earlier. This will
>      raise the latency at run-time *but* there should be no WARNING,
>      ERROR or PANIC messages at run-time on a fully working system.
>      Messages with lower severity are printed "later" by a kthread.

Using 5.0.3-rt1, I get some warning message completely mangled with the rest of 
the output (e.g systemd message) but also between them. Some excerpt of a 500 
lines lockdep warning (AFAICT the printk is not related to the printk code):

[   52.294547] 005: ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
[   52.294553] 005: ...
[   52.294554] 005:   lock_acquire+0xf8/0x318
[  OK  ] Reached target
t_spin_lock+0x48/0x70  lock_acquire+0xf8/0x318
[0;1;39mRemote File Systems.[   52.294570] 005:   iommu_dma_map_msi_msg+0x5c/0x1

[   52.296824] 005: CPU: 5 PID: 2108 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.0.3-rt1-00007-g42ede
9a0fed6 #4312] 005:  __sys_sendmsg+0x68/0xb8

I understand the new series add support for "atomic" print. So I am wondering 
whether this issue is related to it? Is there any advice to prevent the mangling?

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-20 17:15 [ANNOUNCE] v5.0.3-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-22 18:52 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2019-03-25  8:13   ` John Ogness
2019-03-25 10:18     ` Julien Grall
2019-03-25 10:34       ` John Ogness
2019-03-26 10:26         ` Julien Grall
2019-03-26 16:04           ` John Ogness
2019-03-27 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: An all-in-one commit to fix build failures Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-27 18:33   ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/stackprotector: work around stack-guard init from atomic Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-05-10 21:46     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-27 18:33   ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Use a locallock instead local_irq_save() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-27 18:33   ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc: reshuffle TIF bits Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=791056c4-3575-0bd8-031e-44d0e3b21e54@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).