From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: "'zanussi@kernel.org'" <zanussi@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, "John Kacur" <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RT 21/23] sched: migrate_enable: Busy loop until the migration request is completed
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:38:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9003e4a9e5774ecfa377d218c71c2ad2@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd4bda7ad49f46545a03424fd1327dff8a8b8171.1582814004.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: zanussi@kernel.org
> Sent: 27 February 2020 14:34
> [ Upstream commit 140d7f54a5fff02898d2ca9802b39548bf7455f1 ]
>
> If user task changes the CPU affinity mask of a running task it will
> dispatch migration request if the current CPU is no longer allowed. This
> might happen shortly before a task enters a migrate_disable() section.
> Upon leaving the migrate_disable() section, the task will notice that
> the current CPU is no longer allowed and will will dispatch its own
> migration request to move it off the current CPU.
> While invoking __schedule() the first migration request will be
> processed and the task returns on the "new" CPU with "arg.done = 0". Its
> own migration request will be processed shortly after and will result in
> memory corruption if the stack memory, designed for request, was used
> otherwise in the meantime.
>
> Spin until the migration request has been processed if it was accepted.
What happens if the process changing the affinity mask is running
at a higher RT priority than that of the task being changed and
the new mask requires it run on the same cpu?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 14:33 [PATCH RT 00/23] Linux v4.14.170-rt75-rc2 zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 01/23] Fix wrong-variable use in irq_set_affinity_notifier zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 02/23] i2c: exynos5: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 03/23] i2c: hix5hd2: " zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 04/23] x86: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 05/23] sched: migrate_dis/enable: Use sleeping_lock…() to annotate sleeping points zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 06/23] sched: __set_cpus_allowed_ptr: Check cpus_mask, not cpus_ptr zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 07/23] sched: Remove dead __migrate_disabled() check zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 08/23] sched: migrate disable: Protect cpus_ptr with lock zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 09/23] lib/smp_processor_id: Don't use cpumask_equal() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 10/23] futex: Make the futex_hash_bucket spinlock_t again and bring back its old state zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 11/23] locking/rtmutex: Clean ->pi_blocked_on in the error case zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 12/23] lib/ubsan: Don't seralize UBSAN report zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 13/23] kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to raw_spinlock_t zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 14/23] Revert "ARM: Initialize split page table locks for vector page" zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 15/23] locking: Make spinlock_t and rwlock_t a RCU section on RT zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 16/23] sched: migrate_enable: Use select_fallback_rq() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 17/23] sched: Lazy migrate_disable processing zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 18/23] sched: migrate_enable: Use stop_one_cpu_nowait() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 19/23] sched/core: migrate_enable() must access takedown_cpu_task on !HOTPLUG_CPU zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 20/23] lib/smp_processor_id: Adjust check_preemption_disabled() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 21/23] sched: migrate_enable: Busy loop until the migration request is completed zanussi
2020-03-03 19:56 ` Scott Wood
2020-03-03 20:39 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-03-03 21:19 ` Scott Wood
2020-03-03 21:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 13:38 ` David Laight [this message]
2020-03-05 17:58 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 22/23] sched/deadline: Ensure inactive_timer runs in hardirq context zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 23/23] Linux 4.14.170-rt75-rc2 zanussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9003e4a9e5774ecfa377d218c71c2ad2@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).