On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:19:55PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 09.10.2019 16:13, Mark Brown wrote:

> > We should revert the enable call, it shouldn't be required, and ideally
> > the default balancer could be updated to only make configuration changes
> > if they're actually required which would help avoid triggering any such
> > things in future if we don't absolutely have to.

> Okay, Then in case of regulator core - do you accept the initial patch 
> as it indeed forces the default balancer to avoid unnecessary changes, 
> or do you want me to rewrite it to assume min_uV = current_uV for the 
> already enabled regulators during the initial balancing, like suggested 
> by Dmitry?

Neither, I'm suggesting you make the change above.