From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@puri.sm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:23:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1804723c-4aaf-a820-d3ef-e70125017cad@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630180255.GA459638@rowland.harvard.edu>
On 2020-06-30 11:02, Alan Stern wrote:
> Right now there doesn't seem to be any mechanism for resuming the queue
> if an REQ_PREEMPT request is added while the queue is suspended.
I do not agree with the above statement. My understanding is that resuming
happens as follows if a request is submitted against a runtime suspended
queue owned by a SCSI LLD:
blk_queue_enter()
-> blk_pm_request_resume()
-> pm_request_resume(dev)
-> __pm_runtime_resume(dev, RPM_ASYNC)
-> rpm_resume(dev, RPM_ASYNC)
-> dev->power.request = RPM_REQ_RESUME;
-> queue_work(pm_wq, &dev->power.work)
-> pm_runtime_work()
-> rpm_resume(dev, RPM_NOWAIT)
-> callback = scsi_runtime_resume;
-> rpm_callback(callback, dev);
-> scsi_runtime_resume(dev);
-> sdev_runtime_resume(dev);
-> blk_pre_runtime_resume(sdev->request_queue);
-> q->rpm_status = RPM_RESUMING;
-> sd_resume(dev);
-> sd_start_stop_device(sdkp);
-> sd_pm_ops.runtime_resume == scsi_execute(sdp, START);
-> blk_get_request(..., ..., BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT)
-> blk_mq_alloc_request()
-> blk_queue_enter()
-> __blk_mq_alloc_request()
-> blk_execute_rq()
-> blk_put_request()
-> blk_post_runtime_resume(sdev->request_queue);
-> q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
-> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);
-> pm_request_autosuspend(q->dev);
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 11:10 [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-24 13:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-25 8:16 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-25 14:52 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-26 3:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-26 15:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-26 15:44 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-28 2:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-28 13:10 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-29 9:42 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-29 16:15 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-29 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-29 17:40 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 3:33 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-30 13:38 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 15:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-30 18:02 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 19:23 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-06-30 19:38 ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 23:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-01 0:49 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-06 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-28 7:02 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-28 20:02 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 14:12 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 14:32 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 14:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-29 14:56 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 14:46 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 14:53 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 15:40 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 15:44 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 16:43 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 18:25 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 18:29 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-30 8:52 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-30 8:54 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-30 15:10 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-04 9:39 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-07 9:51 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-07 14:30 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-08 6:59 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-08 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-09 9:20 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-09 15:26 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-10 12:03 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-10 14:13 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-11 7:55 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-11 13:48 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-23 14:57 ` [PATCH] block: Fix bug in runtime-resume handling Alan Stern
2020-08-24 17:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-24 20:13 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-26 7:48 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-27 17:42 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-27 20:29 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29 7:24 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-29 15:26 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29 16:33 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-29 18:56 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-30 0:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-30 1:06 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 15:40 ` [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release Alan Stern
2020-07-29 15:49 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 16:17 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 15:52 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 18:10 ` Douglas Gilbert
2020-07-30 8:05 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-30 15:14 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1804723c-4aaf-a820-d3ef-e70125017cad@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@puri.sm \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).