linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
	Zang Leigang <zangleigang@hisilicon.com>,
	Avi Shchislowski <avi.shchislowski@wdc.com>,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	cang@codeaurora.org, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
	MOHAMMED RAFIQ KAMAL BASHA <md.rafiq@samsung.com>,
	Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
	yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
	Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/13] scsi: ufshpb: Add response API
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 20:06:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9619597b-3a3e-e67c-5afa-cebf03cc678b@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589538614-24048-10-git-send-email-avri.altman@wdc.com>

On 2020-05-15 03:30, Avri Altman wrote:
> +#define RSP_DATA_SEG_LEN (sizeof(struct ufshpb_sense_data))

The name of this macro is almost as long as the expression it replaces.
It may make the code easier to read by dropping this macro and using the
sizeof() expression directly.

> +	struct tasklet_struct rsp_tasklet;

Why a tasklet instead of e.g. a work_struct? Tasklets can cause nasty
problems, e.g. CPU lockup complaints if too much work is done in tasklet
context.

> +static void ufshpb_dh_notify(struct ufshpb_lun *hpb,
> +			     struct ufshpb_sense_data *sense)
> +{
> +	struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(hpb->sdev->host);
> +
> +	spin_lock(hba->host->host_lock);
> +
> +	if (scsi_device_get(hpb->sdev)) {
> +		spin_unlock(hba->host->host_lock);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	scsi_dh_set_params(hpb->sdev->request_queue, (const char *)sense);
> +
> +	scsi_device_put(hpb->sdev);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(hba->host->host_lock);
> +}

To me this looks like slight abuse of the scsi_dh_set_params() function.
The documentation of that function mentions clearly that the second
argument is an ASCII string and not e.g. sense data.

Has this driver been tested on a system with lockdep enabled? I don't
think that it is acceptable to use spin_lock() in tasklet context.

> +static void ufshpb_tasklet_fn(unsigned long priv)
> +{
> +	struct ufshpb_lun *hpb = (struct ufshpb_lun *)priv;
> +	struct ufshpb_rsp_element *rsp_elem = NULL;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> +		rsp_elem = ufshpb_get_rsp_elem(hpb, &hpb->lh_rsp);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> +
> +		if (!rsp_elem)
> +			return;
> +
> +		ufshpb_dh_notify(hpb, &rsp_elem->sense_data);
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> +		list_add_tail(&rsp_elem->list, &hpb->lh_rsp_free);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> +	}
> +}

Please schedule work instead of using tasklet context.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-16  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-15 10:30 [RFC PATCH 00/13] scsi: ufs: Add HPB Support Avri Altman
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] scsi: ufs: Add HPB parameters Avri Altman
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] scsi: ufshpb: Init part I - Read HPB config Avri Altman
2020-05-15 15:33   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-16  1:46   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-16  1:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] scsi: scsi_dh: Introduce scsi_dh_ufshpb Avri Altman
2020-05-16  1:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Init part II - Attach scsi device Avri Altman
2020-05-16  1:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Disable HPB if no HPB-enabled luns Avri Altman
2020-05-16  2:02   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] scsi: scsi_dh: ufshpb: Prepare for L2P cache management Avri Altman
2020-05-16  2:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] scsi: scsi_dh: ufshpb: Add ufshpb state machine Avri Altman
2020-05-16  2:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] scsi: dh: ufshpb: Activate pinned regions Avri Altman
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] scsi: ufshpb: Add response API Avri Altman
2020-05-16  3:06   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] scsi: dh: ufshpb: Add ufshpb_set_params Avri Altman
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] scsi: Allow device handler set their own CDB Avri Altman
2020-05-16  3:19   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] scsi: dh: ufshpb: Add prep_fn handler Avri Altman
2020-05-16  3:40   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-15 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] scsi: scsi_dh: ufshpb: Add "Cold" subregions timer Avri Altman
2020-05-16  3:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] scsi: ufs: Add HPB Support Bart Van Assche
2020-05-16  9:14   ` Avri Altman
2020-05-16 17:14     ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]     ` <CGME20200516171420epcas2p108c570904c5117c3654d71e0a2842faa@epcms2p7>
2020-05-19 22:31       ` Another approach of UFSHPB yongmyung lee
2020-05-20 17:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 21:19           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-22 16:35             ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-22 16:49         ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]         ` <CGME20200516171420epcas2p108c570904c5117c3654d71e0a2842faa@epcms2p4>
2020-05-25  5:40           ` Daejun Park
2020-05-25 14:56             ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-26  6:15               ` Avri Altman
2020-05-26 17:03                 ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]                 ` <CGME20200516171420epcas2p108c570904c5117c3654d71e0a2842faa@epcms2p3>
2020-05-27  9:11                   ` Daejun Park
2020-05-27 11:46                     ` Bean Huo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9619597b-3a3e-e67c-5afa-cebf03cc678b@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avi.shchislowski@wdc.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=md.rafiq@samsung.com \
    --cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=zangleigang@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).