From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@intel.com, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 21:14:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhREcdFNtJkXkUrwtbu8GA_h2T5CJ9hAQCU0PSpd5yLGgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214234203.7086-19-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:45 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Netlabel uses LSM interfaces requiring an lsmblob and
> the internal storage is used to pass information between
> these interfaces, so change the internal data from a secid
> to a lsmblob. Update the netlabel interfaces and their
> callers to accommodate the change. This requires that the
> modules using netlabel use the lsm_id.slot to access the
> correct secid when using netlabel.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> include/net/netlabel.h | 8 ++--
> net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 23 +++++++-----
> net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 6 +--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 57 +++++++++++------------------
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.h | 2 +-
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/include/security.h | 1 +
> security/selinux/netlabel.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/ss/services.c | 4 +-
> security/smack/smack.h | 1 +
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 5 ++-
> security/smack/smackfs.c | 10 +++--
> 12 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> index 376882215919..adb9dffc3952 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> @@ -106,15 +106,17 @@ int cipso_v4_rbm_strictvalid = 1;
> /* Base length of the local tag (non-standard tag).
> * Tag definition (may change between kernel versions)
> *
> - * 0 8 16 24 32
> - * +----------+----------+----------+----------+
> - * | 10000000 | 00000110 | 32-bit secid value |
> - * +----------+----------+----------+----------+
> - * | in (host byte order)|
> - * +----------+----------+
> - *
> + * 0 8 16 16 + sizeof(struct lsmblob)
> + * +----------+----------+---------------------+
> + * | 10000000 | 00000110 | LSM blob data |
> + * +----------+----------+---------------------+
> + *
> + * All secid and flag fields are in host byte order.
> + * The lsmblob structure size varies depending on which
> + * Linux security modules are built in the kernel.
> + * The data is opaque.
> */
> -#define CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOC_BLEN 6
> +#define CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOC_BLEN (2 + sizeof(struct lsmblob))
This isn't as bad as the sk_buff.cb limitation so I'm not going to
worry too much about it, but just to be safe I think we should put a
compile-time check to ensure that the local tag is within the bounds
of the IPv4 option limit. If we don't put a check I worry that there
is a chance someone could get a very rude surprise at some point in
the future (yes, this is highly unlikely, but still possible).
> /*
> * Helper Functions
> @@ -1467,7 +1469,8 @@ static int cipso_v4_gentag_loc(const struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def,
>
> buffer[0] = CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOCAL;
> buffer[1] = CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOC_BLEN;
> - *(u32 *)&buffer[2] = secattr->attr.secid;
> + memcpy(&buffer[2], &secattr->attr.lsmblob,
> + sizeof(secattr->attr.lsmblob));
>
> return CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOC_BLEN;
> }
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-07 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200214234203.7086-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 20:37 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-02-18 17:56 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-24 17:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-02-24 18:26 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 22:06 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 22:14 ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10 0:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-10 1:02 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 06/23] Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 0:58 ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10 1:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 1:49 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 2:06 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 2:14 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2020-03-10 1:21 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 20/23] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 21/23] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-02-18 18:17 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-02-18 18:19 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHC9VhREcdFNtJkXkUrwtbu8GA_h2T5CJ9hAQCU0PSpd5yLGgg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).