linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New LSM hooks
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:11:20 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902061207010.19811@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQ6p=LoEN6Rqze48FrVDsX0mfXHY4BvEaxU97w1azP4YQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Paul Moore wrote:

> I believe that will always be a problem, no matter what we do.  The
> point I was trying to make was that everyone, especially the
> maintainers, need to watch for this when patches are posted and make
> sure the patch author posts to the LSM list in addition to any of the
> relevant LSM specific lists.

Right, and there is no way a new LSM hook should ever be added to the 
kernel without review and ack/signoffs from folks on the LSM list 
(especially those who are maintainers of in-tree LSMs).

Casey, do you have any examples of this happening?


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-06  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05 17:40 New LSM hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-02-05 18:15 ` Paul Moore
2019-02-05 20:04   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-06  0:01     ` Paul Moore
2019-02-06  1:11       ` James Morris [this message]
2019-02-06 13:20         ` Stephen Smalley
2019-02-06 17:24           ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-06 17:44             ` Stephen Smalley
2019-02-06 18:18               ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-06 16:30         ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-06 17:06           ` Stephen Smalley
2019-02-06 17:44             ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-06 17:48               ` Stephen Smalley
2019-02-05 18:28 ` Edwin Zimmerman
2019-02-05 19:25   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-02-05 19:58     ` Paul Moore
2019-02-05 20:10     ` Edwin Zimmerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1902061207010.19811@namei.org \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).