From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+29569ed06425fcf67a95@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+e1b8084e532b6ee7afab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tomoyo: Add a kernel config option for fuzzing testing.
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 05:21:52 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903130519440.27366@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1551362770-8655-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> syzbot is reporting kernel panic triggered by memory allocation fault
> injection before loading TOMOYO's policy [1]. To make the fuzzing tests
> useful, we need to assign a profile other than "disabled" (no-op) mode.
> Therefore, let's allow syzbot to load TOMOYO's built-in policy for
> "learning" mode using a kernel config option. This option must not be
> enabled for kernels built for production system, for this option also
> disables domain/program checks when modifying policy configuration via
> /sys/kernel/security/tomoyo/ interface.
I don't understand the logic here. If the cause of this is no policy
loaded combined with running out of memory, shouldn't the no-policy issue
be dealt with earlier?
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 14:06 [PATCH] tomoyo: Add a kernel config option for fuzzing testing Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-04 13:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-04 14:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-03-04 23:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-05 3:32 ` James Morris
2019-03-11 13:18 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-12 17:19 ` James Morris
2019-03-12 21:15 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-12 21:19 ` James Morris
2019-03-12 21:56 ` Edwin Zimmerman
2019-03-13 20:00 ` James Morris
2019-03-12 18:21 ` James Morris [this message]
2019-03-12 20:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-12 21:24 ` James Morris
2019-03-13 10:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-03-13 13:17 ` Paul Moore
2019-03-25 21:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1903130519440.27366@namei.org \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=syzbot+29569ed06425fcf67a95@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+e1b8084e532b6ee7afab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).