From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, "Ayoun,
Serge" <serge.ayoun@intel.com>,
"Katz-zamir, Shay" <shay.katz-zamir@intel.com>,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 17/27] x86/sgx: Add provisioning
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:20:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405142006.GA11612@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWEhcx+Uak+Rmh5F4DvY6=G3nYcMhsN3o1XvdxrGNtsqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 06:53:57AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:18 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:55:03PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > > Hmm.. on 2nd thought the LSM policy or even DAC policy would restrict
> > > > > that the container manager can only access specific files inside
> > > > > securityfs. With this conclusion I still think it is probably the best
> > > > > place for seurity policy like things even for SGX. It is meant for that
> > > > > anyway.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > LSM or DAC policy can certainly *restrict* it, but I suspect that most
> > > > container runtimes don't mount securityfs at all. OTOH, the runtime
> > > > definitely needs to have a way to pass /dev/sgx/enclave (or whatever
> > > > it's called) through, so using another device node will definitely
> > > > work.
> > >
> > > OK, I can cope with this argument. I go with the device names above for
> > > v20.
> >
> > In v20 the refactoring would be with corresponding modes:
> >
> > /dev/sgx 0755
> > /dev/sgx/enclave 0666
> > /dev/sgx/provision 0600
> >
> > The problem that I'm facing is that with devnode callback of struct
> > device_type I can easily give the defaut mode for any of the files but
> > not for the /dev/sgx directory itself. How do I get the appropriate
> > mode for it?
> >
>
> Hi Greg-
>
> Do you know this one?
I guess one option is to not do anything with the mode but instead
contribute rules to udev? I'm not too familiar with this but maybe
that is even recommended way?
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-17 21:14 [PATCH v19 00/27] Intel SGX1 support Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 01/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel-defined SGX feature bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 02/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX sub-features (as Linux-defined bits) Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 03/27] x86/msr: Add IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_ENABLE definition Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 04/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel-defined SGX_LC feature bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 05/27] x86/msr: Add SGX Launch Control MSR definitions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 06/27] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Add new 'PF_SGX' page fault error code bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 07/27] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV for userspace #PFs w/ PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-18 17:15 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-18 19:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 08/27] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support and update caps appropriately Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 09/27] x86/sgx: Add ENCLS architectural error codes Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 10/27] x86/sgx: Add SGX1 and SGX2 architectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 11/27] x86/sgx: Add definitions for SGX's CPUID leaf and variable sub-leafs Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 12/27] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-18 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 14:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-22 10:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-22 10:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 13/27] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 19:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 14:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 15:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-22 11:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-22 16:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 16/27] x86/sgx: Add the Linux SGX Enclave Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 21:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 15:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 16:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-22 11:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-26 13:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-26 23:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-27 5:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-27 17:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-27 18:38 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-03-27 20:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-28 1:21 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-03-28 13:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-28 19:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-29 9:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-29 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-01 10:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-04-01 17:25 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-04-01 22:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-28 13:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 16:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 17:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-22 11:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 17/27] x86/sgx: Add provisioning Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 20:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 2:08 ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-21 14:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 21:41 ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-22 11:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 14:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 14:38 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2019-03-22 11:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 16:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-22 11:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-22 11:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-22 18:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-25 14:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-27 0:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 10:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-04-05 13:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-05 14:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-04-05 14:34 ` Greg KH
2019-04-09 13:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-04-05 14:21 ` Greg KH
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 19/27] x86/sgx: ptrace() support for the SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 22:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 15:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 20/27] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 21/27] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 22/27] x86/fault: Attempt to fixup unhandled #PF in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 23/27] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 25/27] x86/sgx: SGX documentation Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 17:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 16:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 26/27] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-17 21:14 ` [PATCH v19 27/27] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 14:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20190317211456.13927-19-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
2019-03-19 22:09 ` [PATCH v19 18/27] x86/sgx: Add swapping code to the core and SGX driver Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 14:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-19 23:41 ` [PATCH v19 00/27] Intel SGX1 support Sean Christopherson
2019-03-19 23:52 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-03-20 0:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 16:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 16:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190405142006.GA11612@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).