From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH for_v23 3/3] x86/sgx: Move reclaim logic out of sgx_free_page()
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:49:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022224922.28144-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022224922.28144-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Move the reclaim logic out of sgx_free_page() and into a standalone
helper to avoid taking sgx_active_page_list_lock when the page is known
to be unreclaimable, which is the vast majority of flows that free EPC
pages.
Movig reclaim logic to a separate function also eliminates any
possibility of silently leaking a page because it is unexpectedly
reclaimable (and being actively reclaimed).
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
I really don't like the sgx_unmark_...() name, but couldn't come up with
anything better. Suggestions welcome...
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 32 ++++++++-----------------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
index 8045f1ddfd62..22186d89042a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
@@ -474,9 +474,10 @@ void sgx_encl_destroy(struct sgx_encl *encl)
* The page and its radix tree entry cannot be freed
* if the page is being held by the reclaimer.
*/
- if (sgx_free_page(entry->epc_page))
+ if (sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable(entry->epc_page))
continue;
+ sgx_free_page(entry->epc_page);
encl->secs_child_cnt--;
entry->epc_page = NULL;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index 8e7557d3ff03..cfd8480ef563 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
@@ -108,45 +108,29 @@ struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_alloc_page(void *owner, bool reclaim)
* sgx_free_page() - Free an EPC page
* @page: pointer a previously allocated EPC page
*
- * EREMOVE an EPC page and insert it back to the list of free pages. If the
- * page is reclaimable, delete it from the active page list.
- *
- * Return:
- * 0 on success,
- * -EBUSY if a reclaim is in progress
+ * EREMOVE an EPC page and insert it back to the list of free pages. The page
+ * must not be reclaimable.
*/
-int sgx_free_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
+void sgx_free_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
{
struct sgx_epc_section *section = sgx_epc_section(page);
int ret;
/*
- * Remove the page from the active list if necessary. If the page
- * is actively being reclaimed, i.e. RECLAIMABLE is set but the
- * page isn't on the active list, return -EBUSY as we can't free
- * the page at this time since it is "owned" by the reclaimer.
+ * Don't take sgx_active_page_list_lock when asserting the page isn't
+ * reclaimable, missing a WARN in the very rare case is preferable to
+ * unnecessarily taking a global lock in the common case.
*/
- spin_lock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
- if (page->desc & SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMABLE) {
- if (list_empty(&page->list)) {
- spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
- return -EBUSY;
- }
- list_del(&page->list);
- page->desc &= ~SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMABLE;
- }
- spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(page->desc & SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMABLE);
ret = __eremove(sgx_epc_addr(page));
if (WARN_ONCE(ret, "EREMOVE returned %d (0x%x)", ret, ret))
- return -EIO;
+ return;
spin_lock(§ion->lock);
list_add_tail(&page->list, §ion->page_list);
atomic_inc(&sgx_nr_free_pages);
spin_unlock(§ion->lock);
-
- return 0;
}
static void __init sgx_free_epc_section(struct sgx_epc_section *section)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c
index 8067ce1915a4..e64c810883ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c
@@ -125,6 +125,38 @@ void sgx_mark_page_reclaimable(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
}
+/**
+ * sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() - Remove a page from the reclaim list
+ * @page: EPC page
+ *
+ * Clear the reclaimable flag and remove the page from the active page list.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * 0 on success,
+ * -EBUSY if the page is in the process of being reclaimed
+ */
+int sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
+{
+ /*
+ * Remove the page from the active list if necessary. If the page
+ * is actively being reclaimed, i.e. RECLAIMABLE is set but the
+ * page isn't on the active list, return -EBUSY as we can't free
+ * the page at this time since it is "owned" by the reclaimer.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
+ if (page->desc & SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMABLE) {
+ if (list_empty(&page->list)) {
+ spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ list_del(&page->list);
+ page->desc &= ~SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMABLE;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&sgx_active_page_list_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static bool sgx_reclaimer_age(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
{
struct sgx_encl_page *page = epc_page->owner;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
index 45753f236a83..f6d23ef7c74a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h
@@ -81,10 +81,11 @@ extern spinlock_t sgx_active_page_list_lock;
bool __init sgx_page_reclaimer_init(void);
void sgx_mark_page_reclaimable(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
+int sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
void sgx_reclaim_pages(void);
struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_try_alloc_page(void);
struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_alloc_page(void *owner, bool reclaim);
-int sgx_free_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
+void sgx_free_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
#endif /* _X86_SGX_H */
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-22 22:49 [PATCH for_v23 0/3] x86/sgx: More cleanup for v23 Sean Christopherson
2019-10-22 22:49 ` [PATCH for_v23 1/3] x86/sgx: Update the free page count in a single operation Sean Christopherson
2019-10-23 12:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-24 13:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-22 22:49 ` [PATCH for_v23 2/3] x86/sgx: Do not add in-use EPC page to the free page list Sean Christopherson
2019-10-23 12:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-23 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-22 22:49 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-10-23 12:42 ` [PATCH for_v23 3/3] x86/sgx: Move reclaim logic out of sgx_free_page() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-23 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 18:35 ` [PATCH for_v23 0/3] x86/sgx: More cleanup for v23 Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-24 20:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-28 20:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022224922.28144-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).