From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Dr. Greg" <greg@enjellic.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, serge.ayoun@intel.com,
shay.katz-zamir@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Implement cryptographic initialization control.
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:43:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200416174340.GH199110@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407092039.GA11846@wind.enjellic.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 04:20:39AM -0500, Dr. Greg wrote:
> This patch introduces the ability of the platform owner to
> implement cryptographically controlled enclave initialization
> policy. This functionality provides the platform owner with the
> ability to use the identity modulus signature of an enclave
> signer (SHA256 hash of the modulus of the signing key) to gate
> access to enclave initialization, rather then simply relying
> on discretionary access controls that are applied to the SGX
> relevant device driver nodes.
>
> The following policy functionality is introduced in this commit:
>
> 1.) Control over which keys are allowed to initialize an
> enclave.
>
> 2.) Control over which keys are allowed to implement launch
> enclaves.
>
> 3.) Control over which keys are allowed to initialize enclaves
> that have access to the PROVISION_KEY attribute.
>
> For each policy type a plurality of key signatures are allowed.
>
> Absent an intent by the platform owner/administrator to use
> cryptographic initialization policies, this functionality does
> not change the standard behavior of the driver, which is to
> allow any enclave presented to the driver to be initialized.
>
> Cryptographic initialization policy is accessed through the
> following three pseudo-files that are implemented by this patch:
>
> /sys/kernel/security/signing_keys
>
> /sys/kernel/security/launch_keys
>
> /sys/kernel/security/provisioning_keys
>
> Policy keys are registered with the driver by writing the identity
> modulus signature to these files in simple hexadecimal format, ie:
>
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
>
> The current list of policy keys can be displayed by reading the
> contents of the pseudo-files.
>
> In addition to a key signature, the following keywords are
> accepted as valid entries for a policy file:
>
> clear
>
> lock
>
> The 'clear' keyword causes all existing entries in a policy list
> to be deleted.
>
> The 'lock' keyword causes any further modifications or access to
> a policy list to be denied.
>
> All of the policy code is implemented in a single file, policy.c,
> with minimal impact to the driver at large. Since the calculation
> of the identity modulus signature needed to program a launch control
> register is effectively a policy decision, the code to compute the
> signature was moved from the ioctl.c file to the policy.c file.
>
> In order to support a plurality of launch keys the code that
> loops over initialization attempts was pushed downward into a new
> function that is named as follows:
>
> sgx_try_init()
>
> Primarily to avoid excessive indentation that would otherwise be
> needed in the sgx_encl_init() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. Greg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
Sorry, would have responded earlier but forgot to check the
folder where fdm pulls mailing list email's. For shorter
latency I recommend CC'ing.
This comes down to the fact that we are not doing anything
that would prevent doing something similar post upstreaming
(e.g. add a new ioctl for token version of EINIT or whatever)
but is not something that we want to include right now. It is
an additional feature (like other features e.g. virtualization)
/Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-16 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 9:20 [PATCH 1/1] Implement cryptographic initialization control Dr. Greg
2020-04-16 17:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200416174340.GH199110@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=greg@enjellic.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
--cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).