From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
asapek@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com,
chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com,
cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
haitao.huang@intel.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com,
ludloff@google.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com,
puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
yaozhangx@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 12/21] x86/sgx: Allow a limited use of ATTRIBUTE.PROVISIONKEY for attestation
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:20:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630142027.GA7733@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630084956.GB1093@zn.tnic>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:49:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:04:00PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > /dev/sgx/provision is root-only by default, the expectation is that the admin
> > will configure the system to grant only specific enclaves access to the
> > PROVISION_KEY.
>
> Uuh, I don't like "the expectation is" - the reality happens to turn
> differently, more often than not.
Would it help if I worded it as "only root should ever be able to run an
enclave with access to PROVISION_KEY"? We obviously can't control what
admins actually do, hence my wording of it as the expected behavior.
> > In this series, access is fairly binary, i.e. there's no additional kernel
> > infrastructure to help userspace make per-enclave decisions. There have been
> > more than a few proposals on how to extend the kernel to help provide better
> > granularity, e.g. LSM hooks, but it was generally agreed to punt that stuff
> > to post-upstreaming to keep things "simple" once we went far enough down
> > various paths to ensure we weren't painting ourselves into a corner.
>
> So this all sounds to me like we should not upstream /dev/sgx/provision
> now but delay it until the infrastructure for that has been made more
> concrete. We can always add it then. Changing it after the fact -
> if we have to and for whatever reason - would be a lot harder for a
> user-visible interface which someone has started using already.
The userspace and attestation infrastructure is very concrete, i.e. the
need for userspace to be able to access PROVISION_KEY is there, as is the
desire to be able to restrict access to PROVISION_KEY, e.g. I believe Andy
Lutomirski originally requested the ability to restrict access.
The additional infrastructure for per-enclave decisions is somewhat
orthogonal to the PROVISION_KEY, e.g. they won't necessarily be employed
by everyone running enclaves, and environments that do have per-enclave
policies would still likely want the extra layer of restriction for
PROVISION_KEY. I only brought the additional policy crud to call out that
we've done enough path-finding on additional restrictions to have strong
confidence that adding /dev/sgx/provision won't prevent us from adding more
fine grained control in the future.
> So I'd leave that out from the initial patchset.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 22:08 [PATCH v33 00/21] Intel SGX foundations Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 01/21] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX hardware bits Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-22 17:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 1:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 02/21] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control " Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-24 13:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-24 14:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 1:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 03/21] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 15:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 16:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 20:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 21:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 13:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 04/21] x86/sgx: Add SGX microarchitectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 05/21] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 06/21] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 07/21] x86/cpu/intel: Add nosgx kernel parameter Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 08/21] x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 10:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 20:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 09/21] x86/sgx: Add __sgx_alloc_epc_page() and sgx_free_epc_page() Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 17:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 20:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 10/21] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect() Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 17:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 17:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-25 18:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 22:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 22:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 11/21] x86/sgx: Linux Enclave Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 17:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-25 18:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-25 18:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 14:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 20:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 20:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 13:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 14:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-26 9:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-26 14:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-26 14:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-03 23:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03 3:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-26 15:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-04 0:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-26 21:26 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-27 1:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-27 10:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-27 15:20 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-27 15:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-27 17:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-29 15:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-29 15:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-04 1:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-07 1:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-07 3:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-04 1:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-02 3:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-04 3:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-02 3:06 ` Haitao Huang
2020-09-02 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-02 18:40 ` Haitao Huang
2020-09-04 12:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 12/21] x86/sgx: Allow a limited use of ATTRIBUTE.PROVISIONKEY for attestation Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-29 16:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-29 22:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30 8:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-30 14:20 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-06-30 17:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-02 20:47 ` Dr. Greg
2020-07-03 2:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03 2:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03 2:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-03 2:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 13/21] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 14/21] x86/sgx: ptrace() support for the SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 15/21] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-29 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-30 6:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30 8:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-30 14:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-30 16:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-30 17:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-02 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 16/21] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 17/21] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 18/21] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 19/21] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 20/21] docs: x86/sgx: Document SGX micro architecture and kernel internals Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 22:08 ` [PATCH v33 21/21] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200630142027.GA7733@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=asapek@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=chenalexchen@google.com \
--cc=conradparker@google.com \
--cc=cyhanish@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
--cc=kmoy@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludloff@google.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
--cc=puiterwijk@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yaozhangx@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).