linux-sgx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/sgx: Optimize the free_cnt count in sgx_epc_section
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:29:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210124062907.88229-4-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210124062907.88229-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

`section->free_cnt` represents the free page in sgx_epc_section,
which is assigned once after initialization. In fact, just after the
initialization is completed, the pages are in the `init_laundry_list`
list and cannot be allocated. This needs to be recovered by EREMOVE
of function sgx_sanitize_section() before it can be used as a page
that can be allocated. The sgx_sanitize_section() will be called in
the kernel thread ksgxd.

This patch moves the initialization of `section->free_cnt` from the
initialization function `sgx_setup_epc_section()` to the function
`sgx_sanitize_section()`, and then accumulates the count after the
successful execution of EREMOVE. This seems to be more reasonable,
free_cnt will also truly reflect the allocatable free pages in EPC.

Sined-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index 4465912174fd..e455ec7b3449 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ static void sgx_sanitize_section(struct sgx_epc_section *section)
 		if (!ret) {
 			spin_lock(&section->lock);
 			list_move(&page->list, &section->page_list);
+			section->free_cnt++;
 			spin_unlock(&section->lock);
 		} else
 			list_move_tail(&page->list, &dirty);
@@ -643,7 +644,6 @@ static bool __init sgx_setup_epc_section(u64 phys_addr, u64 size,
 		list_add_tail(&section->pages[i].list, &section->init_laundry_list);
 	}
 
-	section->free_cnt = nr_pages;
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-24  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-24  6:29 [PATCH v3 0/5] Some optimizations related to sgx Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-24  6:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] selftests/x86: Simplify the code to get vdso base address in sgx Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-24  6:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/sgx: Optimize the locking range in sgx_sanitize_section() Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-30 13:24   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-24  6:29 ` Tianjia Zhang [this message]
2021-01-27 17:40   ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/sgx: Optimize the free_cnt count in sgx_epc_section Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-11  6:04     ` Tianjia Zhang
2021-02-12 12:19       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-16  3:30         ` Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-24  6:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/sgx: Allows ioctl PROVISION to execute before CREATE Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-30 13:26   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-01 12:55     ` Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-24  6:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/sgx: Remove redundant if conditions in sgx_encl_create Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-24  8:20   ` Greg KH
2021-01-25 18:46     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-30 14:33   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-02-01 12:37     ` Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-25 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Some optimizations related to sgx Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210124062907.88229-4-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).