linux-sgx.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for_v29 3/8] x86/sgx: vdso: Make __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() callable from C code
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:03:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a4878b9-bcad-b279-acd5-2eef03b13af8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319011130.8556-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

On 3/18/2020 6:11 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Make __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() callable from C by preserving %rbx
> and taking @leaf in %rcx instead of %rax.  Being able to invoke the vDSO
> from C reduces the overhead of runtimes that are tightly coupled with
> their enclaves, e.g. that can rely on the enclave to save and restore
> non-volatile registers, as the runtime doesn't need an assembly wrapper
> to preserve non-volatile registers and/or shuffle stack arguments.
> 
> Note, both %rcx and %rbx are consumed by EENTER/ERESUME, i.e. consuming
> them doesn't violate the primary tenet of __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave()
> that "thou shalt not restrict how information is exchanged between an
> enclave and its host process".
> 
> Suggested-by: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Cedric, please go to town on this, you're much better at the userspace
> stack and debugging interactions, e.g. I don't think the CFA directives
> need updating, but my knowledge of that stuff is skeeetchy.
> 
> Note, if the previous patch to make the %rsp restoration relative is
> dropped, then %rbx should be restored relative to %rbp instead of %rsp.
> 
>   arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S | 33 ++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> index 14f07d5e47ae..7a0565476a29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> @@ -16,25 +16,25 @@
>   
>   /**
>    * __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() - Enter an SGX enclave
> + * @rdi:	Pass-through value for RDI
> + * @rsi:	Pass-through value for RSI
> + * @rdx:	Pass-through value for RDX
>    * @leaf:	ENCLU leaf, must be EENTER or ERESUME
> + * @r8:		Pass-through value for R8
> + * @r9:		Pass-through value for R9
>    * @tcs:	TCS, must be non-NULL
>    * @e:		Optional struct sgx_enclave_exception instance
>    * @handler:	Optional enclave exit handler
>    *
> - * **Important!**  __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() is **NOT** compliant with the
> - * x86-64 ABI, i.e. cannot be called from standard C code.
> - *
> - * Input ABI:
> - *  @leaf	%eax
> - *  @tcs	8(%rsp)
> - *  @e 		0x10(%rsp)
> - *  @handler	0x18(%rsp)
> - *
> - * Output ABI:
> - *  @ret	%eax
> + * **Important!**  __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() does not ensure full compliance
> + * with the x86-64 ABI, e.g. doesn't explicitly clear EFLAGS.DF after EEXIT.
> + * Except for non-volatile general purpose registers, preserving/setting state
> + * in accordance with the x86-64 ABI is the responsibility of the enclave and
> + * its runtime, i.e. __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() cannot be called from C code
> + * without careful consideration by both the enclave and its runtime.
>    *
>    * All general purpose registers except RAX, RBX and RCX are passed as-is to
> - * the enclave. RAX, RBX and RCX are consumed by EENTER and ERESUME and are
> + * the enclave.  RAX, RBX and RCX are consumed by EENTER and ERESUME and are
>    * loaded with @leaf, asynchronous exit pointer, and @tcs respectively.
>    *
>    * RBP and the stack are used to anchor __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to the
> @@ -70,9 +70,11 @@
>    */
>   #ifdef SGX_KERNEL_DOC
>   /* C-style function prototype to coerce kernel-doc into parsing the comment. */
> -int __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave(int leaf, void *tcs,
> +int __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave(unsigned long rdi, unsigned long rsi,
> +			     unsigned long rdx, unsigned int leaf,
> +			     unsigned long r8,  unsigned long r9, void *tcs,
>   			     struct sgx_enclave_exception *e,
> -			     sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t handler);
> +			     sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t handler)
>   #endif
>   SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
>   	/* Prolog */
> @@ -82,7 +84,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
>   	.cfi_rel_offset		%rbp, 0
>   	mov	%rsp, %rbp
>   	.cfi_def_cfa_register	%rbp
> +	push	%rbx
A CFI directive is needed here:

	.cfi_rel_offset 	%rbx, -8

>   
> +	mov	%ecx, %eax
>   .Lenter_enclave:
>   	/* EENTER <= leaf <= ERESUME */
>   	cmp	$0x2, %eax
> @@ -108,6 +112,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
>   	jne	.Linvoke_userspace_handler
>   
>   .Lout:
> +	pop	%rbx
>   	leave
>   	.cfi_def_cfa		%rsp, 8
>   	ret
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-19 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19  1:11 [PATCH for_v29 0/8] x86/sgx: Make vDSO callable from C Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 1/8] x86/sgx: vdso: Remove an incorrect statement the enter enclave comment Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19 20:49   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 2/8] x86/sgx: vdso: Make the %rsp fixup on return from handler relative Sean Christopherson
2020-03-20  2:39   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-20  2:42     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 3/8] x86/sgx: vdso: Make __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() callable from C code Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19 20:03   ` Xing, Cedric [this message]
2020-03-19 20:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-20  3:07       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-20 23:26         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-21  0:57           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 4/8] x86/sgx: vdso: Define a typedef for __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 5/8] selftests/x86: sgx: Zero out @result before invoking vDSO sub-test Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 6/8] selftests/x86: sgx: Pass EENTER to vDSO wrapper instead of hardcoding Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 7/8] selftests/x86: sgx: Stop clobbering non-volatile registers Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH for_v29 8/8] selftests/x86: Add selftest to invoke __vsgx_enter_enclave() from C Sean Christopherson
2020-03-20  0:57 ` [PATCH for_v29 0/8] x86/sgx: Make vDSO callable " Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-20 23:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-21  0:55     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-21 20:11       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a4878b9-bcad-b279-acd5-2eef03b13af8@intel.com \
    --to=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).