From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Michael Karcher <kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: Implement __get_user_u64() required for 64-bit get_user()
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:02:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUmpLRyYTPO8LPtOyYtraQ77XZqYy9=8cUiWphmpvczmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601030300.GT1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Hi Rich,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 5:03 AM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:59 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > On 5/31/20 11:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > > On 5/31/20 11:52 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > >> As this is the 64-bit variant, I think this single move should be
> > > >> replaced by a double move:
> > > >>
> > > >> "mov #0,%R1\n\t" \
> > > >> "mov #0,%S1\n\t" \
> > > >>
> > > >> Same for the big endian version below.
> > > >>
> > > >> Disclaimer: uncompiled, untested, no SH assembler expert.
> > > >
> > > > Right, this makes sense. I'll send a new patch shortly.
> > >
> > > Hmm, this change is not the case for __put_user_asm() vs. __put_user_u64().
> > > But I have to admit, I don't know what the part below "3:\n\t" is for.
> >
> > It's part of the exception handling, in case the passed (userspace) pointer
> > points to an inaccessible address, and triggers an exception.
> >
> > For an invalid store, nothing is done, besides returning -EFAULT.
> > Hence there's no "mov #0, %1\n\t" in the put_user case.
> > For an invalid load, the data is replaced by zero, and -EFAULT is returned.
> >
> > > +__asm__ __volatile__( \
> > > + "1:\n\t" \
> > > + "mov.l %2,%R1\n\t" \
> > > + "mov.l %T2,%S1\n\t" \
> > > + "2:\n" \
> >
> > (reordering the two sections for easier explanation)
> >
> > > + ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
> > > + ".long 1b, 3b\n\t" \
> >
> > In case an exception happens for the instruction at 1b, jump to 3b.
> >
> > Note that the m68k version has two entries here: one for each half of
> > the 64-bit access[*].
> > I don't know if that is really needed (and thus SH needs it, too), or if
> > the exception code handles subsequent instructions automatically.
>
> Can I propose a different solution? For archs where there isn't
> actually any 64-bit load or store instruction, does it make sense to
> be writing asm just to do two 32-bit loads/stores, especially when
> this code is not in a hot path?
>
> What about just having the 64-bit versions call the corresponding
> 32-bit version twice? (Ideally this would even be arch-generic and
> could replace the m68k asm.) It would return EFAULT if either of the
> 32-bit calls did.
Yes, that's an option, too.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 17:45 [RESEND] sh: Implement __get_user_u64() required for 64-bit get_user() John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-29 17:45 ` [PATCH] " John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-31 9:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-31 9:54 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-31 9:59 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-31 10:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-31 10:52 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-01 3:03 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01 9:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2020-06-01 9:13 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-01 16:57 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01 20:26 ` Michael Karcher
2020-06-01 20:50 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-02 10:19 ` Michael Karcher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-11 7:58 [PATCH v3] " John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-11 7:58 ` [PATCH] " John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-27 15:26 ` Yoshinori Sato
2020-05-29 17:34 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-29 17:34 ` [PATCH] sh: Implement __get_user_u64() required for 64-bit get_user() John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdUmpLRyYTPO8LPtOyYtraQ77XZqYy9=8cUiWphmpvczmg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).