Hi Vineet, > Hi Alistair, Arnd > > On 2/14/20 2:39 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:30 PM Joseph Myers > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Alistair Francis wrote: > >> > >>>>> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/bits/typesizes.h > >>>>> b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/bits/typesizes.h new file mode > >>>>> 100644 index 0000000000..0da3bdeb5d > >>>>> --- /dev/null > >>>>> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/bits/typesizes.h > >>>> I was hoping newer arches could simply use the asm-generic one ? > >>>> > >>> We need to specify that RV32 uses a 64-bit time_t. The generic > >>> ones don't do that for 32-bit arches. > >> Since it seems we'd like future 32-bit ports of glibc to use > >> 64-bit time and offsets, we should make that as easy as possible. > >> > >> That is, you need an RISC-V-specific bits/timesize.h. But you > >> shouldn't need an RISC-V-specific bits/typesizes.h - rather, make > >> the linux/generic one do the right thing for __TIME_T_TYPE based > >> on bits/timesize.h. And have some other header that 32-bit > >> linux/generic ports can use to say whether they use the 64-bit > >> offset/stat/statfs interface, that bits/typesizes.h can use > >> together with its existing __LP64__ check, and make the > >> definitions of __OFF_T_TYPE etc. check that as well, and then you > >> shouldn't need an RISC-V-specific bits/typesizes.h - the > >> RISC-V-specific headers should be strictly minimal. (No > >> architecture-specific bits/time64.h headers should be needed in > >> any case.) > > Ok, I have updated this. I'll send the patch once my "Always use > > 32-bit time_t for certain syscalls" series is in (the headers are > > changed in that series). > > I guess you haven't pushed changes yet, which don't make full copy of > typesizes.h ? > > Anyhow I have a version based on your prior next branch where I > switched ARC to 64-bit time_t - things work fine in general but I see > some additional failures with the testsuite. > > Consider io/test-stat2.c which calls stat() and stat64() and compares > the results: it now fails for ctime mismatch > > | ... > | st_atime: [72] 644245094405576070 vs [72] 644245094405576070  OK > | st_mtime: [88] 1975684956160000000 vs [88] 1975684956160000000  OK > | st_ctime: [104] 0 vs [104] 2306351876938924035  FAIL > > > In kernel asm-generic stat64 has 32-bit ctime (secs) > >     struct stat64 { >     ... >         int                   st_atime;            <-- offset 72 >         unsigned int    st_atime_nsec; >         int                   st_mtime;            <-- offset *80* >         unsigned int    st_mtime_nsec; >         int                   st_ctime;            <-- offset 92 >         unsigned int    st_ctime_nsec; >     ... >     }; > > In glibc, we have 64-bit time_t based timestamps so the structure > diverges with kernel counterpart from time fields onwards. > >     __extension__ typedef __int64_t __time_t;        <-- ARC switched > to 64-bit time_t > >     struct timespec >     { >       __time_t tv_sec;    <-- 8 >       long int tv_nsec;    <-- 4 >       int: 32;                   <-- 4 >     }; > >     struct stat64 >       { >     ... >         struct timespec st_atim;    <-- offset 72 >         struct timespec st_mtim;    <-- offset *88* >         struct timespec st_ctim;    <-- offset 104 >         int __glibc_reserved[2]; >       }; > > However glibc stat64()wrapper calls > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/xstat64.c > > which for ARC is just doing a pass thru syscall because we do have > __NR_fstatat64 > - hence the issues I see. > > It needs itemized copy > >     __xstat64 (int vers, const char *name, struct stat64 *buf) >     { >     #ifdef __NR_fstatat64 >           return INLINE_SYSCALL (fstatat64, 4, AT_FDCWD, name, buf, > 0); #else >     .... >           int rc = INLINE_SYSCALL (statx, 5, AT_FDCWD, name, > AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT, STATX_BASIC_STATS, &tmp); >         __cp_stat64_statx (buf, &tmp); >     #endif > > An the reason this all works on RISCV is that your kernel doesn't > define __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 -> lacks __NR_statat64 and instead uses the > statx call which does itemized copy and would work fine when copying > from 32-bits time (in kernel) to 64-bits container in glibc. Is this > is right understanding or am I missing something here. > > How do I build a latest RISCV 32-bit kernel + userland - do you have > a buildroot branch somewhere that I can build / test with qemu ? Maybe a bit off topic - there is such QEMU and Yocto/OE based test sandbox for ARM32: https://github.com/lmajewski/meta-y2038 (the README provides steps for setup). > > Thx, > -Vineet > > > Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de