linux-snps-arc.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpumask()
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:30:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322103004.GA571242@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322093955.GR2017917@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:35:52PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > trace_ipi_raise() is unsuitable for generically tracing IPI sources due to
> > its "reason" argument being an uninformative string (on arm64 all you get
> > is "Function call interrupts" for SMP calls).
> > 
> > Add a variant of it that exports a target cpumask, a callsite and a callback.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> >  include/trace/events/ipi.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/ipi.h b/include/trace/events/ipi.h
> > index 0be71dad6ec03..b1125dc27682c 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/ipi.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/ipi.h
> > @@ -35,6 +35,28 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ipi_raise,
> >  	TP_printk("target_mask=%s (%s)", __get_bitmask(target_cpus), __entry->reason)
> >  );
> >  
> > +TRACE_EVENT(ipi_send_cpumask,
> > +
> > +	TP_PROTO(const struct cpumask *cpumask, unsigned long callsite, void *callback),
> > +
> > +	TP_ARGS(cpumask, callsite, callback),
> > +
> > +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > +		__cpumask(cpumask)
> > +		__field(void *, callsite)
> > +		__field(void *, callback)
> > +	),
> > +
> > +	TP_fast_assign(
> > +		__assign_cpumask(cpumask, cpumask_bits(cpumask));
> > +		__entry->callsite = (void *)callsite;
> > +		__entry->callback = callback;
> > +	),
> > +
> > +	TP_printk("cpumask=%s callsite=%pS callback=%pS",
> > +		  __get_cpumask(cpumask), __entry->callsite, __entry->callback)
> > +);
> 
> Would it make sense to add a variant like: ipi_send_cpu() that records a
> single cpu instead of a cpumask. A lot of sites seems to do:
> cpumask_of(cpu) for that first argument, and it seems to me it is quite
> daft to have to memcpy a full multi-word cpumask in those cases.
> 
> Remember, nr_possible_cpus > 64 is quite common these days.

Something we litte bit like so...

---
Subject: trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpu()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Mar 22 11:28:36 CET 2023

Because copying cpumasks around when targeting a single CPU is a bit
daft...

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/smp.h        |    6 +++---
 include/trace/events/ipi.h |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/irq_work.c          |    6 ++----
 kernel/smp.c               |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ extern void arch_smp_send_reschedule(int
  * scheduler_ipi() is inline so can't be passed as callback reason, but the
  * callsite IP should be sufficient for root-causing IPIs sent from here.
  */
-#define smp_send_reschedule(cpu) ({				  \
-	trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(cpu), _RET_IP_, NULL);  \
-	arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);				  \
+#define smp_send_reschedule(cpu) ({		  \
+	trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_, NULL);  \
+	arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);		  \
 })
 
 /*
--- a/include/trace/events/ipi.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ipi.h
@@ -35,6 +35,28 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ipi_raise,
 	TP_printk("target_mask=%s (%s)", __get_bitmask(target_cpus), __entry->reason)
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(ipi_send_cpu,
+
+	TP_PROTO(const unsigned int cpu, unsigned long callsite, void *callback),
+
+	TP_ARGS(cpu, callsite, callback),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(unsigned int, cpu)
+		__field(void *, callsite)
+		__field(void *, callback)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->cpu = cpu;
+		__entry->callsite = (void *)callsite;
+		__entry->callback = callback;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("cpu=%s callsite=%pS callback=%pS",
+		  __entry->cpu, __entry->callsite, __entry->callback)
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(ipi_send_cpumask,
 
 	TP_PROTO(const struct cpumask *cpumask, unsigned long callsite, void *callback),
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -78,10 +78,8 @@ void __weak arch_irq_work_raise(void)
 
 static __always_inline void irq_work_raise(struct irq_work *work)
 {
-	if (trace_ipi_send_cpumask_enabled() && arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
-		trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()),
-				       _RET_IP_,
-				       work->func);
+	if (trace_ipi_send_cpu_enabled() && arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
+		trace_ipi_send_cpu(smp_processor_id(), _RET_IP_, work->func);
 
 	arch_irq_work_raise();
 }
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static __always_inline void
 send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func)
 {
 	if (call_function_single_prep_ipi(cpu)) {
-		trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cpumask_of(cpu), _RET_IP_, func);
+		trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_, func);
 		arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
 	}
 }
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, st
 	 * even if we haven't sent the smp_call IPI yet (e.g. the stopper
 	 * executes migration_cpu_stop() on the remote CPU).
 	 */
-	if (trace_ipi_send_cpumask_enabled()) {
+	if (trace_ipi_send_cpu_enabled()) {
 		call_single_data_t *csd;
 		smp_call_func_t func;
 

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07 14:35 [PATCH v5 0/7] Generic IPI sending tracepoint Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpumask() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22  9:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 10:30     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-03-22 11:24       ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] sched, smp: Trace IPIs sent via send_call_function_single_ipi() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] smp: Trace IPIs sent via arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] irq_work: Trace self-IPIs sent via arch_irq_work_raise() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] treewide: Trace IPIs sent via smp_send_reschedule() Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] smp: reword smp call IPI comment Valentin Schneider
2023-03-07 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22  9:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 12:20     ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 14:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 17:01         ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 17:22           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-22 18:22             ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-22 23:14               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-23 16:25         ` Valentin Schneider
2023-03-23 17:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-23 18:31             ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230322103004.GA571242@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).