From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88D2C433E0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1CD20748 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lc1a1w+x"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="VAxfHhQ/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F1CD20748 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=m/KpULzlQjoozFVsiAuKyBoblYap+NR3FQOOGC5lszo=; b=lc1a1w+xbqAQJ2Ygr9JoNPMmP 6+P7+/vHmnmMDKwnrQtpd4ngXXP2ESA3OpSCZ7c9sSPoEEm8EJ7uNoaHTqL4xwYNJBKkeHySvYE6r 38lK7ahH2nGt9sqIKp2apmJ10FrZOklcwwilGfVE99rtIG3ApQcNQlFJDdYEfvP8M4BFaK5LFRZ/r yijJxqst07xa06CcTjb8NkrTrIeIhgDbkJ855nlNQeDTH14P53BmsIUru0FEoA1EIvEvRWyUOI1nh p3iEgw+vlsTZHt3os0c7h4IQzVEjz5gd1l1ZwOEWJd4nGtol4cGBtNC2APjX/0OkseCDsFcapXmn8 6q8OcBgDw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jtzhs-00034n-Nu; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:33:17 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120] helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jtzhp-00033t-7h for linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:33:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594413192; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yaGOBqqHo1H90CdC6FWwdB0kg2TaCYJA+YnCe7iys2U=; b=VAxfHhQ/v1NBOmUk9iUI34cfwvwX8NSH85kwLxvkvTR9lqEZgy68BHAzZ76Gd9zoxLUJuc lhRHVh2ZqxH9utt+TTT5aL8rFQnkMb1yPQHDdNJ5fEFK7zbHqhynQ0A9VHTsFbdJqk5000 3/7BCJFMSPUMUzf7RJmgrCeVXrvtbdQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-174-uKMi7TVCO2KjdC3aTILxqw-1; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:33:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: uKMi7TVCO2KjdC3aTILxqw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4521083; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-113-118.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.118]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D484E10013C4; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:33:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Alistair Francis Subject: Re: ARC testsuite regressions (was Re: [PATCH v7.2 07/13] ARC: Linux Syscall Interface) References: <8ec1c7a1-dd77-5f1f-a2a4-11d214152a0d@linaro.org> <20200707205506.31537-1-vgupta@synopsys.com> <273d42de-dc2b-2101-8705-04b399bd46cc@linaro.org> <2c7b73bd-d738-6af8-90b0-514ad22d929f@synopsys.com> <130fbd5a-cec8-4930-0b5e-da53d8d582ea@synopsys.com> <5f20da5f-8612-099b-3257-56c18f10cfa0@synopsys.com> <87o8on4t38.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:33:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Alistair Francis's message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:12:02 -0700") Message-ID: <87mu47w1od.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200710_163313_304785_ABAE7199 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vineet Gupta , arcml , Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org * Alistair Francis: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:55 AM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha > wrote: >> >> On 7/10/20 2:28 AM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: >> > * Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha: >> > >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: >> >>>>> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs now (expect some >> >>>>> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run >> >>>> >> >>>> No regressions in sysvipc tests ! >> >>> >> >>> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream 81b1c8cbb5b4 >> >>> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC port >> >>> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for >> >>> shmctl)" >> >>> >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2 >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3 >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4 >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5 >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static >> >> >> >> I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32. >> > >> > Did you rebuild from scratch? After the libc.so/ld.so ABI changes that >> > went in recently, it could be the result of incomplete make >> > dependencies. >> >> From scratch meaning glibc alone or the whole toolchain. I used buildroot and >> glibc-dirclean to nuke entire glibc but gcc was not rebuilt. I can try that too. > > That's the same with me. The toolchain wasn't rebuilt but glibc was > built from a clean directory. I am rebuilding now with a rebuilt > toolchain. > >> >> Some of the failed tests have prints about static TLS block ... so I'm wondering >> if they could be related ? > > I see the same messages. > >> >> | $ cat dlfcn/tststatic.out >> | .../build/libc.so.6: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block > > That's what I see as well. Sorry, my fault. I posted a patch that should fix static dlopen: Would you mind testing it? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc