From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Make linux/printk.h self-contained Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:40:38 +1000 Message-ID: <20200615114038.GA20708@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20200611125144.GA2506@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200613122834.GA23739@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20200613130949.GA22005@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200613142901.65xieioomt6bbqa6@ltop.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from helcar.hmeau.com ([216.24.177.18]:49154 "EHLO fornost.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728510AbgFOLlU (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:41:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200613142901.65xieioomt6bbqa6@ltop.local> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Luc Van Oostenryck Cc: kernel test robot , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kbuild-all@lists.01.org On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 04:29:01PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > while there is no such problem with the previous commit. > I think the problem is that: > * ratelimit.h needs raw_spinlock_t > * spinlock_types.h needs lockdep.h > * lockdep.h needs ratelimit.h Thanks for investigating. I now realise that this was sent against my first patch which did have this problem, which was fixed in my second patch. Sorry for the false alarm. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt