From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] attribute: directly use attribute_specifier() to handle attributes
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 22:53:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200809205329.42811-6-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200809205329.42811-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
handle_attributes() used to also handle asm names and so used
the declarator method associated to the taken. But now, asm names
are handled in a separated function.
So, directly use attribute_specifier() to handle the attributes
instead of using it via the declarator method.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
parse.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c
index ec675f20ef01..14b1746d38c5 100644
--- a/parse.c
+++ b/parse.c
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static struct token *handle_attributes(struct token *token, struct decl_state *c
break;
if (!(keyword->op->type & KW_ATTRIBUTE))
break;
- token = keyword->op->declarator(token->next, ctx);
+ token = attribute_specifier(token->next, ctx);
}
return token;
}
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-09 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-09 20:53 [PATCH 00/10] separate parsing of asm-names from attributes Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] use lookup_keyword() for qualifiers Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] attribute: split handle_asm_name() from handle_attributes() Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 03/10] attribute: fold parse_asm_declarator() into handle_asm_name() Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] attribute: remove argument 'keywords' from handle_attributes() Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` Luc Van Oostenryck [this message]
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] attribute: factorize matching of '__attribute__' Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] attribute: no need to lookup '__attribute__' in NS_KEYWORD Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] testing for SYM_KEYWORD is unneeded for lookup_keyword() Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] testing for sym->op " Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-08-09 20:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] keyword type is a bitmask and must be tested so Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200809205329.42811-6-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--to=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).