linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] x86: Cure per CPU madness on UP
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:06:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86796005-f1d9-4c8c-80d8-f1f88ca220ba@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0g3hm5o.ffs@tglx>

On 3/21/24 04:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20 2024 at 08:46, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 3/20/24 01:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 15 2024 at 09:17, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> I don't know the code well enough to determine what is wrong.
>>>> Please let me know what I can do to help debugging the problem.
>>>
>>> Could you provide me the config and the qemu command line?
>>>
>>
>> defconfig-CONFIG_SMP and
>>
>> qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -cpu Haswell \
>>        --append "console=ttyS0" -nographic -monitor none
>>
>> The cpu doesn't really matter as long as it is an Intel CPU.
>> A root file system isn't needed since the boot doesn't get that far.
> 
> Now it get's interesting because I can't reproduce it with that setup at
> all.
> 
> What's weird is that I saw it exactly once on 64-bit in a VM with a UP
> config two days ago, but when I started to add instrumentation it never
> came back even after backing the instrumentation changes out. I have
> seriously no idea what's going on there.
> 
> Is it fully reproducible on your side?
> 

Yes, always.

> If so can you please provide a full dmesg and then apply the patch below
> and provide the resulting full dmesg too?
> 

You'll find everything at http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/x86-nosmp/

The crash is gone after applying your patch. The difference is:

+       /*
+        * If there was no APIC registered, then the map check below would
+        * fail. With no APIC this is guaranteed to be an UP system and
+        * therefore all topology levels have only one entry and their
+        * logical ID is obviously 0.
+        */
+       if (topo_info.boot_cpu_apic_id == BAD_APICID) {
+               pr_info("#### topo_info.boot_cpu_apic_id == BAD_APICID\n");
                 ^^^^ I added this
+               return 0;
+       }
+

I see the "#### topo_info.boot_cpu_apic_id == BAD_APICID" message
twice in the log. See patched.log at the page pointed to above.

Hope the helps,
Guenter


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-21 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 10:12 [patch 0/9] x86: Cure tons of sparse warnings (mostly __percpu) Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 1/9] perf/x86/amd/uncore: Fix __percpu annotation Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 2/9] x86/msr: Prepare for including percpu.h Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 3/9] x86/msr: Add missing __percpu annotations Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 4/9] smp: Consolidate smp_prepare_boot_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 5/9] x86: Cure per CPU madness on UP Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-15 16:17   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-15 16:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-15 17:02       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-15 17:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-15 22:55         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-15 23:23           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-16  1:11             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-16  1:23               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-16 21:34                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-17 21:03               ` David Laight
2024-03-18 11:11               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-18 17:27               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-18 19:13                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19 16:21                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-19 18:26                     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-16  0:56           ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-20  8:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-20 15:46       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-21 11:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-21 14:06           ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-03-21 16:49             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 6/9] x86/uaccess: Add missing __force to casts in __access_ok() and valid_user_address() Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 7/9] x86/cpu: Use EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL() for x86_spec_ctrl_current Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 8/9] x86/cpu: Provide a declaration for itlb_multihit_kvm_mitigation Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 9/9] x86/callthunks: Use EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL() for per CPU variables Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 11:08 ` [patch 0/9] x86: Cure tons of sparse warnings (mostly __percpu) Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86796005-f1d9-4c8c-80d8-f1f88ca220ba@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).