From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4401C04AAC for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 22:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A948A20862 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 22:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nexb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@nexb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="KaNPvAEf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726196AbfETWo1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 18:44:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:46907 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726107AbfETWo1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 18:44:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id r7so16277742wrr.13 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:44:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y0RgEH4YxvaB591pc1mH45oIn0ut/rQDxEqbhE+0hHc=; b=KaNPvAEfitjAmQGjDTXEXi+Bnn3m0PB4k7ItLQbyyJglCbbQTpsx4HARALZBpbGKJG nHT9aVAzz3upKVM2fEEOUZzJtEGa+TUtySsCriVJZXfyi6MkdOfptWaSW9q/3F2jyQgg 4czYMAi+cF8RmXk/Qp9D0jqmXW5WKSL7Q5e3Vw2EZ0ojqnMfozIfsRFme8Wb/lPKnMWN pDcE+BQ8fGbqGZcUZdjUfaWuvlrfrAW7rVRlkaHQEyHs2ivr/BwBX5cK482NVuBN0QQU KQaMFFw+OGiyguNidZ5qvD8gQtTPbUpU4VY7aPTHPxIq9eWpDiCKp6pFQuNuzwSDLcRQ MUsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y0RgEH4YxvaB591pc1mH45oIn0ut/rQDxEqbhE+0hHc=; b=Xu4a5YvheOYaNBeEtGjLszV6EPTZUzGN4x3cXPHeMbWwYyx2A4GQxWhop73fe0JK4x i4IwJ65HN2sSFbbwjFVcG7h5uEFbXjc78RCwP2yXd/4y6IQMp8zX44pGfwdYgmdkD7GV /pAcrywJAPVMlWVRjM5qR7AuEw2yH0q5Nbt/Exsy5SYSe615d4ipwK7F0MvIyYe5dnXB EKqxa8HOXxVygzgwtLVv/ykewmO0XKEJOd1uRm8qa2yGZa0oZXKy/i6Hh1RJvdcSfAcV e1jboMEiE6mg7+5x/wTtoxrb+pkBecV0dvUrWTImQPoqxu2aYYsAl5eu4sJdJ5PUoQli 6tyw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWsVR1RZUhRAOFScpVut4UOle4J0riMP/BeobD8ooJ7/prn7QT5 tjmgXwU2/rBnGHSUl2/KBcwXGBGmgcfo1Wnvavbw60DuZKmE0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWEnVCPcPx6UUctSzsHrFIeJZ20BaP+oHVl3xtZf3pjZcfnvVbuqc0YWPshzum6wdbxH7VNDfL1aWjwfANAuA= X-Received: by 2002:adf:8367:: with SMTP id 94mr21737907wrd.179.1558392265577; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:44:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190519135130.462579320@linutronix.de> <20190519154042.138630237@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: From: Philippe Ombredanne Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 00:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 16/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 16 To: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Cc: Richard Fontana , Steve Winslow , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Richard, Steve: On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:28 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Right. I'm not a SPDX wizard, but I think we need a new SPDX id, > e.g. BSD-DISCLAIMER or something to that effect and then have > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later AND BSD-DISCLAIMER > > as the concluded license, which allows us to remove both the GPL > boilerplate and the disclaimer. Right now we can't do anything because the > BSD-DISCLAIMER id does not exist. I can add something like that for detection. I found a BSD disclaimer used in a six GPL notices I track with three minor variants of the disclaimer: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/gpl-2.0_149.RULE https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/gpl-2.0-plus_113.RULE https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/gpl-2.0-plus_121.RULE Do you think it is worth tracking a license for that (e.g. bsd-disclaimer id) ? If so, this is pretty easy to add. -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne