From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] spi: Allow SPI controller override device buswidth Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 12:43:38 +0000 Message-ID: <20200303124338.GD3866@sirena.org.uk> References: <1582903131-160033-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1582903131-160033-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-spi , Linuxarm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , MTD Maling List , Andy Shevchenko To: John Garry Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:42:45AM +0000, John Garry wrote: > However, maybe another callback could be introduced, .early_setup(). One thing I like about the explicit core code is that it makes it much easier to see which drivers are doing the worrying thing, with just overwriting things in a callback everything is very freeform and you have to audit things individually. --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEyBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl5eUPkACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BYcAf4kl/gydZycwZtTddrolWZTe5aGp9hdBn91H5K4i0f3Sp/wzjZi9Z7NMLZ hFT1kd7fwU9kHr5QBDt66s8mnC/A8WU/yLekP7hKQkumLFBXT+EzpW4ZsD0OFB8R KvAr5BCFqvJMdRPYCqsqi1nvZwNA4jYhWXp5sGlT3T/4GH0ulhQDZghULkx+8e06 Kd23pOwyQmDQgwVTqQ/YuB36cPzriYsoxu3vijQZLIVGO4K/PPqiaoq5Af1EiGlr mcwa0IaW3IMQbjLk5KPuITz8YUMrPryVc+unOuertCfFYoHcYmgIO/Aq6yOpnbRl UajtjXoFfB5jRdSGvoDFHjZcfYfJ =FOcd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+--