From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
Radu Pirea <radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] spi: spi-at91-usart: Make use of the defined 'struct of_device_id'
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 08:56:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716075606.GM3165313@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715212443.GC23553@piout.net>
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On 15/07/2020 16:06:30+0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > It's there so why not use it.
> >
>
> Is that the correct resolution? Isn't the proper thing to do simply
> removing at91_usart_spi_dt_ids as the only way it will ever be probed is
> through drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c and I would think matching the driver
> name is enough.
I'm 50/50 on this.
Happy with whatever the authors/maintainers decide most appropriate.
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >
> > drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c:684:34: warning: ‘at91_usart_spi_dt_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> > 684 | static const struct of_device_id at91_usart_spi_dt_ids[] = {
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Cc: Radu Pirea <radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro>
> > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c b/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c
> > index 88033422a42ae..d47a20be43ccd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c
> > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static struct platform_driver at91_usart_spi_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "at91_usart_spi",
> > .pm = &at91_usart_spi_pm_ops,
> > + .of_match_table = at91_usart_spi_dt_ids,
> > },
> > .probe = at91_usart_spi_probe,
> > .remove = at91_usart_spi_remove,
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 15:06 [PATCH 00/14] Rid W=1 warnings in SPI Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/14] spi: spi-loopback-test: Fix formatting issues in function header blocks Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/14] spi: spi-bitbang: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment blocks Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/14] spi: spi-davinci: Fix a few kerneldoc misspellings and API slippages Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 04/14] spi: spi-ep93xx: Fix API slippage Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/14] spi: spi-meson-spifc: Fix misdocumenting of 'dev' in 'struct meson_spifc' Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/14] spi: spi-meson-spicc: Remove set but never used variable 'data' from meson_spicc_reset_fifo() Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/14] spi: spi-s3c64xx: Add missing entries for structs 's3c64xx_spi_dma_data' and 's3c64xx_spi_dma_data' Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/14] spi: spi-pl022: Provide missing struct attribute/function param docs Lee Jones
2020-07-16 13:59 ` Linus Walleij
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] spi: spi-zynq-qspi: Add description for 2 missing attributes/parameters Lee Jones
2020-07-16 7:19 ` Michal Simek
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Correct a couple of misspellings in kerneldoc Lee Jones
2020-07-16 7:20 ` Michal Simek
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: Add missing descriptions to 'struct pch_spi_data' Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] spi: spi-at91-usart: Make use of the defined 'struct of_device_id' Lee Jones
2020-07-15 21:24 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-16 7:56 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-07-16 8:50 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] spi: spi-pxa2xx: Do not define 'struct acpi_device_id' when Lee Jones
2020-07-15 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] spi: spi-amd: " Lee Jones
2020-07-20 11:12 ` [PATCH 00/14] Rid W=1 warnings in SPI Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200716075606.GM3165313@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).