From: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
To: "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
<simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>, <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
<richard@nod.at>, <cheol.yong.kim@intel.com>,
<qi-ming.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add multi-chipselect support for Intel LGM SoC
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:43:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021151329.t24cli4rnk6esttm@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021025507.51001-4-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 21/10/20 10:55AM, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>
> Add multiple chipselect support for Intel LGM SoCs,
> currently QSPI-NOR and QSPI-NAND supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> index 3d017b484114..3bf6d3697631 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>
> /* Capabilities */
> #define CQSPI_SUPPORTS_OCTAL BIT(0)
> +#define CQSPI_SUPPORTS_MULTI_CHIPSELECT BIT(1)
>
> struct cqspi_st;
>
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct cqspi_st {
> bool is_decoded_cs;
> u32 fifo_depth;
> u32 fifo_width;
> + u32 num_chipselect;
> bool rclk_en;
> u32 trigger_address;
> u32 wr_delay;
> @@ -1070,6 +1072,14 @@ static int cqspi_of_get_pdata(struct cqspi_st *cqspi)
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> + if (!cqspi->use_direct_mode) {
Shouldn't this be guarded by CQSPI_SUPPORTS_MULTI_CHIPSELECT instead of
cqspi->use_direct_mode?
Also, cqspi->use_direct_mode would always be false here because
cqspi_of_get_pdata() is called before we set it...
> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-chipselect",
> + &cqspi->num_chipselect)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "couldn't determine number of cs\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
... so even if someone doesn't want to use multiple chip selects they
would have to specify this property or the probe will fail, which is the
case on J721E EVM for example.
> + }
> + }
> +
> cqspi->rclk_en = of_property_read_bool(np, "cdns,rclk-en");
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1307,6 +1317,9 @@ static int cqspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> cqspi->current_cs = -1;
> cqspi->sclk = 0;
>
> + if (ddata->hwcaps_mask & CQSPI_SUPPORTS_MULTI_CHIPSELECT)
> + master->num_chipselect = cqspi->num_chipselect;
> +
> ret = cqspi_setup_flash(cqspi);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to setup flash parameters %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1396,6 +1409,7 @@ static const struct cqspi_driver_platdata am654_ospi = {
> };
>
> static const struct cqspi_driver_platdata intel_lgm_qspi = {
> + .hwcaps_mask = CQSPI_SUPPORTS_MULTI_CHIPSELECT,
> .quirks = CQSPI_DISABLE_DAC_MODE,
> };
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments India
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 2:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add QSPI controller support for Intel LGM SoC Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add QSPI " Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] spi: cadence-quadspi: Disable the DAC " Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 15:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-22 2:17 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-22 9:01 ` Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-22 9:14 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add multi-chipselect support " Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 14:46 ` Mark Brown
2020-10-21 15:13 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2020-10-22 2:07 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] spi: Move cadence-quadspi.txt to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: spi: Convert cadence-quadspi.txt to cadence-quadspi.yaml Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-10-21 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2020-10-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for Intel LGM SoC Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201021151329.t24cli4rnk6esttm@ti.com \
--to=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cheol.yong.kim@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=qi-ming.wu@intel.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).