linux-sunxi.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: Implement precalculated NKM rate selection
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 15:27:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230527132747.83196-3-frank@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230527132747.83196-1-frank@oltmanns.dev>

Add a new precalculation method for NKM clock rate selection in the
sunxi-ng clock driver. Introduce ccu_nkm_find_best_precalc which uses a
precalculated table of valid NKM combinations (struct clk_nkm_table and
struct clk_nkm_combo) to find the best rate. This approach provides
faster rate selection by searching a table of valid combinations rather
than calculating for all possible combinations.

The table of NKM combinations needs to be initialized with meaningful
combinations only, i.e. removing redundant combinations that result in
the same rate.

Keep the existing ccu_nkm_find_best function in place and use it as a
fallback if no precalculated table is provided.

Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h | 26 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
index 94d2a83992b2..9652f6df17bd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
@@ -54,6 +54,49 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
 	return best_rate;
 }
 
+static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_precalc(unsigned long parent,
+					       unsigned long rate,
+					       struct _ccu_nkm *nkm,
+					       struct clk_nkm_table *table)
+{
+	unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_diff = ULONG_MAX;
+	unsigned long best_n = 0, best_k = 0, best_m = 0;
+	int start = 0, end = table->num - 1, mid;
+
+	while (start <= end) {
+		unsigned long tmp_rate;
+		unsigned long tmp_diff;
+
+		mid = (start + end) / 2;
+
+		tmp_rate = parent * table->combos[mid].n * table->combos[mid].k /
+			   table->combos[mid].m;
+
+		tmp_diff = abs(rate - tmp_rate);
+
+		if (tmp_diff < best_diff) {
+			best_rate = tmp_rate;
+			best_diff = tmp_diff;
+			best_n = table->combos[mid].n;
+			best_k = table->combos[mid].k;
+			best_m = table->combos[mid].m;
+			if (best_diff == 0)
+				goto out;
+		}
+		if (rate < tmp_rate)
+			end = mid - 1;
+		else
+			start = mid + 1;
+	}
+
+out:
+	nkm->n = best_n;
+	nkm->k = best_k;
+	nkm->m = best_m;
+
+	return best_rate;
+}
+
 static void ccu_nkm_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 {
 	struct ccu_nkm *nkm = hw_to_ccu_nkm(hw);
@@ -119,17 +162,22 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
 	struct ccu_nkm *nkm = data;
 	struct _ccu_nkm _nkm;
 
-	_nkm.min_n = nkm->n.min ?: 1;
-	_nkm.max_n = nkm->n.max ?: 1 << nkm->n.width;
-	_nkm.min_k = nkm->k.min ?: 1;
-	_nkm.max_k = nkm->k.max ?: 1 << nkm->k.width;
-	_nkm.min_m = 1;
-	_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
-
 	if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
 		rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
 
-	rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+	if (nkm->table.num)
+		rate = ccu_nkm_find_best_precalc(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm,
+						 &nkm->table);
+	else {
+		_nkm.min_n = nkm->n.min ?: 1;
+		_nkm.max_n = nkm->n.max ?: 1 << nkm->n.width;
+		_nkm.min_k = nkm->k.min ?: 1;
+		_nkm.max_k = nkm->k.max ?: 1 << nkm->k.width;
+		_nkm.min_m = 1;
+		_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
+
+		rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+	}
 
 	if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
 		rate /= nkm->fixed_post_div;
@@ -157,14 +205,18 @@ static int ccu_nkm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 	if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
 		rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
 
-	_nkm.min_n = nkm->n.min ?: 1;
-	_nkm.max_n = nkm->n.max ?: 1 << nkm->n.width;
-	_nkm.min_k = nkm->k.min ?: 1;
-	_nkm.max_k = nkm->k.max ?: 1 << nkm->k.width;
-	_nkm.min_m = 1;
-	_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
-
-	ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+	if (nkm->table.num)
+		rate = ccu_nkm_find_best_precalc(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm,
+						 &nkm->table);
+	else {
+		_nkm.min_n = nkm->n.min ?: 1;
+		_nkm.max_n = nkm->n.max ?: 1 << nkm->n.width;
+		_nkm.min_k = nkm->k.min ?: 1;
+		_nkm.max_k = nkm->k.max ?: 1 << nkm->k.width;
+		_nkm.min_m = 1;
+		_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
+		ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(nkm->common.lock, flags);
 
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
index 6601defb3f38..fa5551724921 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
@@ -12,6 +12,30 @@
 #include "ccu_div.h"
 #include "ccu_mult.h"
 
+struct clk_nkm_combo {
+	u8	n;
+	u8	k;
+	u8	m;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct clk_nkm_table - Table of all meaningful combinations for n, k, and m
+ *
+ * @num: Number of entries in the table
+ * @combos: Array of combos (of size num) that are supported by this clock.
+ *
+ * This table shall contain all meaningful combinations of n, k, and m. That
+ * means that combinations that result in the same clock rate shall only be
+ * listed once. For example, if both
+ * { .n = 1, .k = 2, .m = 2} and  { .n = 2, .k = 2, .m = 4}
+ * are valid values for n, k, and m, only one of them would be allowed because
+ * both result in a factor of 1.0.
+ */
+struct clk_nkm_table {
+	size_t			num;
+	struct clk_nkm_combo	*combos;
+};
+
 /*
  * struct ccu_nkm - Definition of an N-K-M clock
  *
@@ -29,6 +53,8 @@ struct ccu_nkm {
 	unsigned int		fixed_post_div;
 
 	struct ccu_common	common;
+
+	struct clk_nkm_table	table;
 };
 
 #define SUNXI_CCU_NKM_WITH_MUX_GATE_LOCK(_struct, _name, _parents, _reg, \
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-27 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-27 13:27 [RFC PATCH 0/3] clk: sunxi-ng: Optimize rate selection for NKM clocks Frank Oltmanns
2023-05-27 13:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: Minimize difference when finding rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-05-27 13:27 ` Frank Oltmanns [this message]
2023-05-27 23:19   ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] clk: sunxi-ng: Implement precalculated NKM rate selection Julian Calaby
2023-05-28  9:12     ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-05-28 15:32       ` Julian Calaby
2023-05-28 17:12         ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-05-28 14:11   ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-05-27 13:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i-a64: Precalculate NKM combinations for pll-mipi Frank Oltmanns
2023-05-31 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] clk: sunxi-ng: Optimize rate selection for NKM clocks Maxime Ripard
2023-06-01  5:16   ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-01 19:41     ` Jernej Škrabec
2023-06-02  7:34       ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-05 11:41         ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-02  7:31     ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-05 10:31       ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-06 14:02         ` Maxime Ripard
2023-06-06 20:40           ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-07 11:42             ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230527132747.83196-3-frank@oltmanns.dev \
    --to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=icenowy@aosc.io \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).