From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D264CC433ED for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B210761363 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348742AbhESPGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 11:06:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49788 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233074AbhESPGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 11:06:38 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A58C06175F for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id c196so5199028oib.9 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kUFkVQwXrFrMqJtyCnd+ULw82lKFOS0wHbQud7ObpXs=; b=czWbsnoQNGIC4tvs403bdga3VM/SywCejBqUx4EkCi+MRaU7WmvBOLYps+8Cgoz31Q /RgF5pKsWKdc9FsBw0fWZEkh9kGqst0xcMRmju4GMq4p4wDS1I5xUPRyO5kO4ZkKLk8O uqtwNzPfG/EiP3Ty3eBKv6XifKdN1rzpmCWuyDQ794EYgEj3UPoAD9YyKtxaFqH+XXmy Hs5i3Qaz+KR3xeeZCx9lKIyMnEPTfefNbrKFOKHAZC7/XS5LqlyxzIQ4HKoL0q9zKyJ6 wwjV4sd1hY62V001kXddK2Gc1x+IBDcmyz6hdtgCSkZu3OxmrO+Wp3F1rwUGEiv/dflo uzOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kUFkVQwXrFrMqJtyCnd+ULw82lKFOS0wHbQud7ObpXs=; b=NoyLDvymWD9S0l8ionCbQSmhgS5M0M7HVXMenPqQ4c5AWBVm5ztVUKXCpxUxWJcZaR 7QM4TUrnBsx9yL8+ibVXiyNfnzNTGEryyt6vZgovGT7/DeYuoCUFuMSphR91BepA4LhR Mv+eumIMy2ZIqnstDvvo+ceXkVA8Use0HIgH3sf0gACqlpUG49UXcIgwNPYUc3vWxi+2 glZ+5hdPWt7EljwheI06Q6p5LAcPVES0zrJlGBg7yIxjlKKoHTN9CzvrND74cj9MRI+I ipk8hO/5HmSP1ahtExi7lIo7fcmwFDHygusbWfCm+YSexHoYqokDypeSTVhfVU8LDQl0 1wrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tM71EIvJRD5ryTtyMX6H7KeHDXqZAL2uUN+eRIdhnm/dEhcQm 7Bl4giiAhQzn5fj1bxNhKB7VNjiwAjmORkolFCtszg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9TAEDHGncyRGBxEvjNvaLtdwWLCgBgFykxuHL8V1G5tUuUO1Dkz0K2r9fVOOGw6ZgFf9+ETdCQkcba+DT54M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:144f:: with SMTP id x15mr8509771oiv.172.1621436716864; Wed, 19 May 2021 08:05:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210518121447.GB7914@willie-the-truck> <20210518124311.r4fwv6lfz3erkqnb@treble> <20210518124819.lkzzgjcrh4cc5a6i@treble> <20210518200306.GE21560@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20210519093240.GA2797@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20210519115654.GC2797@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> In-Reply-To: From: Marco Elver Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 17:05:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux Plumbers Conf 2021 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Desaulniers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon , "Jose E. Marchesi" , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 17:02, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > On 5/19/21 4:04 PM, Marco Elver wrote: > > +Cc Martin, who helped us last time with no_sanitize issues in GCC. > > > > Martin, as far as we're aware there's no > > __attribute__((no_sanitize_coverage)) for GCC -- is it possible to > > implement this? Some context below. Thank you. > > Yes, I've just implemented the attribute and I'm going to send it to > the gcc-patches mailing list tomorrow. Very nice, thank you! -- Marco